Digital Women’s Literature in the Italian High Schools: Canon and Invisible Feminist Writers in Study Plans

Main Article Content

Giulia Gerratana

Abstract

The inadequate representation of Italian women writers in the Italian school curriculum has been a topic of concern over the last few years, raising questions about their exclusion from the literary school canon despite their contributions. Through an examination of the relationships between gender, literature, and education, altogether with the feminist critique work carried out since the 1970s, this paper seeks to explore digital learning environments that promote gender-related reflections in Italian secondary schools and to examine key factors that have contributed to the invisibility of Italian women writers in educational contexts. Through the specific quantitative analysis of the digital textbook Letteratura Oggi, tomes 3A and 3B, intended for the students of the Italian lyceum last year, this article addresses the presence of any improvements made for major equity between writers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gerratana, G. (2025). Digital Women’s Literature in the Italian High Schools: Canon and Invisible Feminist Writers in Study Plans. Asparkía. Investigació Feminista, (46). https://doi.org/10.6035/asparkia.8031
Section
Articles

References

Abrams, Meyer Howard. (2004). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Aguilar Ciciliano, Mauricio. (2013). School Literary Canon and Teaching of Literature in Middle School: A Critical Analysis of High School Programs in El Salvador. Revista Electrónica Educare, 17(3), 173-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.17-3.9

Amícola, José. (2006). Otras voces, otros cánones. Orbis Tertius, 11(12).

Arruzza, Cinzia & Cirillo, Lidia. (2017). Storia delle storie del femminismo. Edizioni Alegre.

Avolio, Beatrice; Pardo, Eduardo, & Prados-Peña, Ma Belén. (2024). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women academics worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 27(1), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09838-3

Balzano, Gennaro. (2022). Il ruolo del digitale a scuola dopo la pandemia. Verso una scuola 4.0. Studi Sulla Formazione/Open Journal of Education, 25(2), 97-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.36253/ssf-14039

Bastianello, Martina. (2023, 06 01). L’ologramma. Una lettura obliqua del Piano Scuola 4.0. Studium Educationis, (1), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.7346/SE-012023-15

Biemmi, Irene. (2009). Genere e processi formativi, Sguardi femminili e maschili sulla professione di insegnante. Edizioni ETS.

Biemmi, Irene & Leonelli, Silvia. (2017). Gabbie di genere: Retaggi sessisti e scelte formative. Rosenberg & Sellier.

Bloom, Harold. (1995). The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. Papermac.

Bonvecchio, Paola. (2017). La letteratura impigliata nella rete: l'impiego efficace delle nuove risorse illustrato ai nativi digitali in Riva, Francesc (Ed.), Insegnare letteratura nell’era digitale. Edizioni ETS.

Canals-Botines, Mireia; Medina-Casanovas, Núria; Raluy-Alonso, Ángel, & Pujol-Tubau, Miquel. (2021). La narración de historias en la enseñanza virtual: percepciones, herramientas digitales y experiencias en la escuela primaria durante el confinamiento. Educación y Humanismo, 23(41).

Carioli, Stefania. (2018). Narrazioni digitali nella letteratura per l’infanzia. Franco Angeli.

Carrasco Bengoa, Cristina; Barragán Brito, Encarna; Beltrán Felip, María de los Reyes; Gil Gómez, Alicia, & Sales Salvador, Adoración. (2000). Mujeres. Mediar para acceder a otros trabajos, otros empleos, otras vías. Universitat Jaume I.

Corduas, Gigliola Ciummei. (2014). Il Miur e la difficile parità in Sapegno, Maria Serena (Ed.), La differenza insegna: la didattica delle discipline in una prospettiva di genere (pp. 47-51). Carocci.

Criado-Perez, Caroline. (2020). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Vintage.

Crispino, Anna Maria. (2003). Oltrecanone. Per una cartografia della scrittura femminile. Manifestolibri.

Cristina, Caracchini. (2019). Aleramo, Montessori, Hallgarten: Reti di Donne Nell’Italia di Inizio ’900 in Michela Prevedello, Sandra Parmegiani (Ed.), Femminismo e femminismi nella letteratura italiana dall'Ottocento al XXI secolo (p. 41-60). Società Editrice Firenze.

Cuna, Andrea. (2020). Fra ‘letterario’ e digitale: alle origini delle Digital Humanities. Le Simplegadi, 18(20), 136-146. 10.17456/SIMPLE-162

Eardley, Alice. (2007). Recreating the Canon: Women Writers and Anthologies of Early Modern Verse. Women’s Writing, 14(2), 270-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699080701314782

Engdahl, Horace. (2013). Canonization and World Literature: The Nobel Experience in D’hahen, Theo; Domínguez, César, & Thomsen, Mads Thomsen (Eds.), World Literature: A Reader (pp. 316-327). Routledge Literature Readers.

Espinosa, María Paz & Ferreira, Eva. (2022). Gender implicit bias and glass ceiling effects. Journal of Applied Economics, 25(1), 37-57, DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2021.2007723

Ferro, Laura. (2019). Contro la donna «intelligente come un uomo». Il femminismo di Goliarda Sapienza in Parmegiani, Sandra & Prevedello, Michela (Eds.), Femminismo e femminismi nella letteratura italiana dall'Ottocento al XXI secolo (p. 209-226). Società Editrice Fiorentina.

Finke, Laurie. (2018). A Powerful Infidel Heteroglossia: Toward a Feminist Theory of Complexity in Finke, Laurie A. Feminist Theory, Women’s Writing. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.57993

Fishelov, David. (2008). Dialogues with/and Great Books: With Some Serious Reflections on Robinson Crusoe. New Literary History, 39(2), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0022

Futura. (2022). Piano Scuola 4.0. PNRR Istruzione. https://pnrr.istruzione.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/PIANO_SCUOLA_4.0_VERSIONE_GRAFICA.pdf

Gamberi, Cristina. (2014). Ripensare la relazione educativa in ottica di genere. Riflessioni teoriche e strumenti operative in Sapegno, Maria Serena (Ed.), La differenza insegna: la didattica delle discipline in una proposta di genere (pp. 13-22). Carocci.

Godayol Nogué, Pilar. (2021). Feminismos y traducción (1965-1990). Editorial Comares.

González Navarro, Ana. (2017). Rachida Benmasud y la feminización del canon a través de la ginocrítica marroquí//Rachida Benmassoud and the feminization of the canon through Moroccan gynocritics. Journal of Feminist, Gender and Women Studies, (6), 23-32.

Gorak, Jan. (1991). The Making of the Modern Canon: Genesis and Crisis of a Literary Idea. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.

Government of Italy. (2012). Decree-Law of October 18, 2012, No. 179 - Further urgent measures for the growth of the country. Normattiva. Retrieved from https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto.legge:2012;179~art11-com4

Grassi, Paul A., Garcia, Miquel E., & Fenton, James L. (2017). Digital identity guidelines: Revision 3 (NIST SP 800-63-3; p. NIST SP 800-63-3). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63-3

Gualtieri, Gillian. (2011). Canonized Women and Women Canonizers: Gender Dynamics in The Norton Anthology of English Literature’s Eight Editions. Gender Issues, 28(1-2), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9099-y

Guaraldo, Olivia. (2023). Anatomia e politica in Carla Lonzi. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Politica, 4, 137-155.

Guillory, John. (1993). Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. The University of Chicago Press.

Jacobus, Mary. (1979). The Difference of View in Jacobus, Mary, Women writing and writing about women. (pp. 10-22). Croom Helm.

Langella, Giuseppe. (2017). Premessa in Riva, Francesca (Ed.), Insegnare letteratura nell’era digitale. Edizioni ETS.

Leonelli, Silvia. (2011). La Pedagogia di genere in Italia: dall’uguaglianza alla complessificazione. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. 6. 10.6092/issn.1970-2221/2237.

Leproni, Raffaella. (2021). The Challenge of Distant Teaching for Primary School Teachers of English during the Covid-19: The Cases of Spain, Italy and Romania. LEA. Lingue e Letterature d’Oriente e d’Occidente, 10, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.13128/LEA-1824-484X-12798

Marçal, Maria Mercè, & Ibarz, Mercè. (2004). Sota el signe del drac: Proses, 1985-1997. Proa.

Ministry of Education, University and Research. (2010). Legislative Decree of 29 December 2010, No. 275 - General rules on the organization of work in public administration. Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, General Series No. 292 of December 14, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2010/12/14/010G0232/sg

Ministry of Education, University and Research. (2015). Law No. 107 of July 13, 2015, Article 1, paragraphs 56-59. [Retrieved: https://scuoladigitale.istruzione.it/pnsd/]

Moi, Toril. (2006). Reflexiones teóricas in Moi, Toril, Teoría literaria feminista (pp. 80-89). Cátedra.

Orsi, Marianna. (2021). Donne invisibili — Come i manuali di Letteratura ignorano il contributo femminile (Prima parte). Radici Digitali.

Perissinotto, Alessandro. (2015). L’opera letteraria nell’epoca della sua lettura digitale. Form@re. Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 15(1), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.13128/FORMARE-15435

Pignagnoli, Virginia. (2016). Se il digitale entra nel romanzo. Appunti per una letteratura post-postmoderna in Pignagnoli, Virginia, & Ulrich, Silvia (Eds.), Open Literature. La Cultura Digitale Negli Studi Letterari (pp. 53-67). Università degli Studi di Torino, QuadRi, Quaderni di RiCOGNIZIONI.

Pozo-Sánchez, Begoña, & Padilla-Carmona, Carles. (2021). Criptoginia: Una palabra nueva, un concepto para investigar. Quaderns de Filologia — Estudis Lingüístics, 26, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.0.21983

Robinson, Lillian S. (1983). Treason Our Text: Feminist Challenges to the Literary Canon. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 2(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/464208

Roncaglia, Gino. (2020). L’età della frammentazione: Cultura del libro e scuola digitale. Economica Laterza.

Russ, Joanna, & Crispin, Jessa. (2018). How to suppress women’s writing. University of Texas Press.

Sapegno, Maria Serena. (2011). Dal catalogo alla narrazione identitaria. Quaderns d’Italià, 16, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qdi.293

Sapegno, Maria Serena. (2014). La differenza insegna: La didattica delle discipline in una prospettiva di genere. Carocci Editore.

Savelli, Aurora. (2022). La didattica della storia di genere: Alcune note sul contesto italiano. REIDICS. Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, (11), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.17398/2531-0968.11.20

Showalter, Elaine. (1977). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton University Press.

Showalter, Elaine. (1979). Towards A Feminist Poetics in Jacobus, Mary (Ed.), Women writing and writing about women (pp. 22-41). Croom Helm.

Todd, Janet. (1991). Feminist literary history: a defence. Polity Press.

Woolf, Virginia. (2022). Matar al ángel del hogar. Carpe Noctem. Trad. Alberto Gómez Vaquero.

Woolf, Virginia & Barrett, Michelle (Ed.). (1981). Le donne e la scrittura / Virginia Woolf. La Tartaruga Edizioni. Trad. Adriana Boyyini.

Zakaria, Fatih. (2011). The Literary Canon and its Religious Precursor in Papadima, Liviu; Damrosch, David, & D’haen, Theo (Eds.), The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries (pp. 121-132). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042032828_010

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.