Breast cancer, discourse and cognition metaphor and image schemas of the disease and its participants in Peru
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since breast cancer is an important condition in quantitative terms that puts the life and health of Peruvian women at risk (Posso et al., 2015), it is advisable to go beyond objective medical facts (e.g., use of drugs, surgeries, etc.), and also evaluate how the female population of said country experiences, understands, expresses and relates to the disease. Along these lines, this work seeks to analyze the way in which the Peruvian woman experiences and conceives her illness, as well as the way in which she experiences it and faces it day by day. To do this, we study the metaphors and image schemes involved in the discursive construction of the disease from a set of real testimonies from Peruvian women who, after having recovered or in the course of their recovery, decided to tell their stories to inspire and provide support to other women who still suffer from the condition. As a result, the analyzed discourses discover a series of specific representations in which women configure their experience around the disease through conceptual domains involved with war and people, but also with certain rudimentary structures that configure their way of understanding cancer, such as containment, locomotion and force schemas.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An open-access CREATIVE COMMONS copyright license is used. Those authors whose works are published by this journal, accept the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right to first publish their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY SA that allows third parties to share the work, provided that its author and first publication is indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematics file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase quotes of the published work.
References
Anudo, Cellyne y Benard Kodak (2020). Conceptual metaphor and image schema representations of cancer-related deaths of selected prominent Kenyan personalities in the print media. Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 7-27.
Bowker, Janet. (1996). Cancer, individual process, and control: A case study in metaphor analysisb. Health Communication, 8(1), 91-104.
Bray, Freddie, Jacques Ferlay, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Rebecca Siegel, Lindsay Torre y Ahmedin Jemal (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
Brookes, David y Eugenia Etkina (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 1-16
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank. Joseph y Marco Antonio Malca Belén (2019). La representación discursiva del estudiante universitario sanmarquino por la prensa en el Perú: un enfoque desde la Lingüística Cognitiva. Discurso & Sociedad, 13(4), 575-594. http://www.dissoc.org/es/ediciones/v13n04/DS13%284%29Dominguez&Malca.pdf
Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph, Diana Ibelice Conchacalle Cáceres y Marco Antonio Malca Belén (2021). Metáforas, representación discursiva y migración venezolana en el Perú: hacia un análisis crítico-cognitivo del discurso de la prensa escrita peruana. Lengua Y migración, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.37536/LYM.13.2.2021.1553
Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph y Diana Ibelice Conchacalle Cáceres (2022). Covid-19, vacunación y discurso: diferenciación social en la prensa del Perú. Altre Modernità, 28, 86-100. https://doi.org/10.54103/2035-7680/19115.
Domínguez Chenguayen, Frank Joseph y Diana Ibelice Conchacalle Cáceres (2023). Muerte, relaciones de poder y discurso en la prensa peruana «la máquina que causó la muerte de dos jóvenes en McDonald’s». Metáfora. Revista de Literatura y Análisis del Discurso, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.36286/mrlad.v3i6.159
Edelman, Murray (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. University of Chicago Press.
Evans, Vyvyan y Melanie Green (2018). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Gee, James Paul (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (4th ed.). Routledge.
Gibbs, Raymond (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond y Heather Franks (2002). Embodied metaphor in women’s narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14(2), 139-165.
Johnson, Mark (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6,168-184.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George y Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
Laranjeira, Carlos (2013). The role of narrative and metaphor in the cancer life story: A theoretical analysis. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 16, 469-481.
Magaña, Dalia y Teenje Matlock (2018). How Spanish speakers use metaphor to describe their experiences with cancer. Discourse & Communication, 12(6), 627-644.
Navarro Ferrando, Ignasi (2017). Conceptual metaphor types in oncology. Ibérica, 34, 163-186.
Peña Cervel, María (2012). Los esquemas de imagen. En I. Ibarretxe y J. Valenzuela (Eds), Lingüística cognitiva (pp. 97-122). Anthropos.
Posso, Margarita, Teresa Puig y Xavier Bonfill (2015). Balance entre riesgos y beneficios del tamizaje mamográfico de cáncer de mama: ¿apoyaría su recomendación en mujeres peruanas? Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 32(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2015.321.1584
Reisfield, Gary y George Wilson (2004). Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(19), 4024-4027.
Rojas Miranda, Daniela y Loreto Fernández González (2015). ¿Contra qué se lucha cuando se lucha? Implicancias clínicas de la metáfora bélica en oncología. Revista Médica de Chile, 143(3), 352-357.
Semino, Elena y Zsofia Demjén (2017). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv012
Skott, Carola (2002). Expressive metaphors in cancer narratives. Cancer Nursing, 25(3), 230-235.
Talmy, Leonard. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49-100.
van Dijk, Teun (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Julia (2016). Get the metaphor right! Cancer treatment metaphors in the English and Spanish press. Alfinge, 28, 109-138.
Wodak, Ruth y Michael Meyer (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage.
Yamamoto, Mutsumi (2006). Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. John Benjamins Publishing.