Dynamism and participant identification in the discursive construction of the American nation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the linguistic choices used in political discourse to represent social actors and their role in the construction of national storylines. We focus on Donald Trump’s and Joseph Biden’s inaugural speeches as a critical exploratory context. The analytical approach involves contrasting their choices for assigning dynamism to social
actors through transitivity roles and for identifying participants through direct, indirect, and pronominal strategies. Our findings show that Trump assigns Actor + Goal roles that construe citizens as agents impinging on material reality, while Biden assigns them Actor – Goal roles that represent citizens as participants in happenings. Trump’s identification of participants shows a higher proportion of indirect strategies linked with possessive
qualification, whereas Biden stands out for his frequent use of the singular first person. The findings suggest connections between the strategies identified and the construction of national identities and storylines, both permeated by political leaders’ ideological orientations.
Downloads
Article Details
An open-access CREATIVE COMMONS copyright license is used. Those authors whose works are published by this journal, accept the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right to first publish their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY SA that allows third parties to share the work, provided that its author and first publication is indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematics file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase quotes of the published work.
Funding data
-
Universidad del Norte
Grant numbers 2022-016
References
Amaireh, Hanan (2023). Biden's rhetoric: A corpus-based study of the political speeches of the American president Joe Biden. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 13(3): 728–735. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1303.22
Auerbach, Erich (2013). The Idea of the national spirit as the source of modern humanities. In James Porter (Ed.), Time, history, and literature: Selected essays of Erich Auerbach (pp. 56–62). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691234526-009
Beyinli, Gökçen (2022). Reframing Turkey, Istanbul and national identity: Ottoman history, ‘chosen people’ and the opening of shrines in 1950. Nations and Nationalism, 28(4): 1428–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12824
Blas Arroyo, José Luis (2010). Interpersonal issues in political discourse. In Miriam Locher & Sage Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 405–434). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.3.405
Bolívar, Adriana (2017). Political discourse as dialogue: A Latin American perspective. Routledge.
Bonikowski, Bart & Noam Gidron (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952-1996. Social Forces, 94(4): 1593–1621. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120
Chilton, Paul (2003). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Colomer, Josep Maria (2007). Great empires, small nations: The uncertain future of the sovereign state. Routledge.
Councilor, K. C. (2017). Feeding the body politic: metaphors of digestion in Progressive Era US immigration discourse. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(2): 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2016.1274044
Darics, Erica & Veronika Koller (2019). Social actors “to go”: An analytical toolkit to explore agency in business discourse and communication. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82 (2): 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619828367
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, & Ruth Wodak (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10(2): 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002
Demata, Massimiliano (2022). Discourses of borders and the nation in the USA: A discourse-historical analysis. Taylor & Francis.
Fetzer A and Bull P (2012) Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society, 23: 127–144.
García, Alexandra (2017). 'On the grammar of death': the construal of death and killing in Colombian newspapers. Functional Linguistics, 4(10): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0044-6
Garcia-Jaramillo, D., Santos, T.R., Fernandes-Jesus, M. (2023). “Not wanting to see it is hypocrisy, it's denying what is obvious”: Far-right discriminatory discourses mobilised as common sense. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, [article preview]. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2734
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (2006). Construing experience through meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. 2nd Edition. Continuum.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Korkwood & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (2014). Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. Routledge.
Hasan, Ruqaiya (1985). Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Haverda, Myra Bethany & Jeffrey Halley (2019). Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Adorno’s psychological technique: Content analyses of authoritarian populism. TripleC, 17(2): 202–220. doi:10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1077
Hidalgo-Tenorio, Encarnación & Miguel-Ángel Benítez-Castro (2022). Trump’s populist discourse and affective politics, or on how to move ‘the people’ through emotion. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2): 86–109. doi:10.1080/14767724.2020.1861540
Hobsbawm, Eric John (1992). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Holland, Jack & Ben Fermor (2021). The discursive hegemony of Trump’s Jacksonian populism: Race, class, and gender in constructions and contestations of US national identity, 2016–2018. Politics, 41(1): 64–79. doi:10.1177/0263395720936867
Khan, Mohsin Hassan, Farwa Qazalbash, Hamedi Mohd Adnan, Nurul Yaqin, Lalu, &Rashid Ali Khuhro (2021). Trump and Muslims: A critical discourse analysis of islamophobic rhetoric in Donald Trump’s selected tweets. SAGE Open, 11(1) doi:10.1177/21582440211004172
KhosraviNik, Majid (2010). Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948
Kranert, M. (2017). Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society, 2017, Vol. 28(2): 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516685463
Kolakowski, Leszek (2003). On collective identity. Partisan Review, 70(1), 7.
Koller, Veronika (2009). Analysing collective identity in discourse: social actors and contexts. [Texte anglais original]. Semen. Revue de sémio-linguistique des textes et discours, (27). https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.8877
Lensmire, Timothy J. (2017). White folks: Race and identity in rural America. Routledge.
Lingle, Will (2021). When do agentless passives mystify social actors in the minds of readers? Critical Discourse Studies, 20: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.2010586
Liu, Dilin & Lei Lei (2018). The appeal to political sentiment: An analysis of Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s speech themes and discourse strategies in the 2016 US presidential election. Discourse, Context and Media, 25: 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.05.001
Lukin, Annabelle (2019). War and its ideologies. A social semiotic theory and description. Springer.
Martin, James & Peter. R. White (2003). The language of evaluation. Vol. 2. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martínez Lirola, María (2022). A critical discourse study of the portrayal of immigrants as non-citizens in a sample from the Spanish press. Lengua y migración, 14(1). http://hdl.handle.net/10017/53078
Musolff, Andreas (2010). Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the Body Politic. Routledge.
Musolff Andreas (2023). Migrants’ NATION-AS-BODY metaphors as expressions of transnational identities, Language and Intercultural Communication, 23:3: 229–240, DOI: 10.1080/14708477.2022.2157836
O'Grady, Gerard (2011). The unfolded imagining of Ségolène Royal. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10): 2489–2500. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.007
Panaitiu, Ioana. G. (2020). Apes and anticitizens: Simianization and US national identity discourse. Social Identities, 26(1): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2019.1679621
Poguntke T and Webb P (2005) The presidentialization of politics in democratic societies: A framework for analysis. In Poguntke T. and Webb P. (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press.
Reyes, Antonio (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6): 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265114199
Reyes, Antonio (2020). I, Trump: The cult of personality, anti-intellectualism and the post-truth era. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(6): 869–893. doi:10.1075/jlp.20002.rey
Schertzer, Robert & Eric Woods (2021). Nationalism: the ethno-nationalist populism of Donald Trump’s Twitter communication. Ethnic and racial studies, 44(7): 1154–1173. 10.1080/01419870.2020.1713390
Smith, Anthony David (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. London: Basil Blackwell.
Somek, Alexander (2020). Cosmopolitan constitutionalism: The case of the European Convention. Global Constitutionalism, 9(3): 467–489. DOI: 10.1017/S2045381720000076
Szabó, Éva Eszter (2022). The crisis of the American sense of mission at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth Centuries. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies, 28(1). 10.30608/HJEAS/2022/28/1/4
van Leeuwen, Theo (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
Wang, Yaqin & Haitao Liu (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump’s political discourse during the 2016 election. Discourse and Society, 29(3): 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734659
Wang, Guofeng & Ma Xueqin (2021). Were they illegal rioters or pro-democracy protestors? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests in China Daily and The New York Times. South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 35(2): 85–99.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2021.1925940
Wilson, John (1990). Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. B. Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth (2021). From Post-Truth to Post-Shame: Analyzing far-right populist rhetoric. In Approaches to Discourse Analysis (pp. 175–192). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Wodak, Ruth & Bernd Matouschek (1993). ‘We are dealing with people whose origins one can clearly tell just by looking’: Critical discourse analysis and the study of Neo-Racism in Contemporary Austria. Discourse & Society, 4(2): 225–248.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002005
Xiang, Qiujian (2022). Transitivity analysis of Joe Biden’s inaugural address from the perspective of Systemic Functional Grammar. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1): 165–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.20