UN ANÁLISIS DEL GÉNERO DE TEXTOS BIOGRÁFICOS DE LA WEB IMDb
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Autor/es
Özgür ÇELİK
Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Turkey
RESUMEN
El análisis del género está entre las áreas principales de estudio del inglés para fines específicos (ESP, por sus siglas en inglés) y ha ido ganando importancia de forma gradual, ya que tiene implicaciones claras, directas y productivas sobre el campo del ESP. El aumento radical de la digitalización ha contribuido a que los estudios de género sean más específicos y precisos. La participación de usuarios en la web como creadores de contenido ha aumentado la especificidad de los géneros y las comunidades virtuales han empezado a crear sus propios subgéneros; los textos biográficos son un buen ejemplo de ello. El objetivo del presente estudio es llevar a cabo un análisis del género de los textos biográficos en la página web Internet Movie DataBase (IMDB) creados por los miembros de la comunidad virtual. Los textos proceden de las biografías de los últimos 20 actores y actrices ganadores de un Oscar, con los que se compiló un corpus. Para analizar los textos, se siguió el modelo Analysis of Multi-Genre Structures (AMS) de Casañ-Pitarch (2017). Según los resultados del análisis, se proponen unos contenidos basados en el género como parte de una asignatura de English for General Academic Purposes.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Alley, M. and Neeley, K.A. 2005. “Rethinking the design of presentation slides: A case for sentences headlines and visual evidence”. Technical Communication, 52 (4), 417-427.
Analyze My Writing. 15 November 2018. <http://www.analyzemywriting.com/>
Askehave, I. 1999. “Communicative purpose as genre determinant”. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 12 (23), 13-23.
Baud, M. 2005. “The Birth of Biography in Ancient Egypt: Text Format and Content in the IVth Dynasty”. In Seidlmayer, S. J. (Ed.) Texte und Denkmäler des ägyptischen Alten Reiches (Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae; 3). Berlin, S. 91-124.
Beghtol, C. 2001. “The concept of genre and its characteristics”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27 (2), 19-17.
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. 1993. “Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective”. Written communication, 10 (4), 475-509.
Bhatia, V. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Biographical data guidelines. 3 December 2019 < https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/names-biographical-data/biographical-data-guidelines/GMT9T242VQADZUQM?ref_=helpart_nav_4#>
Bunton, D. 2002. “Generic moves in PhD thesis Introductions”. In Flowerdew, J. (Ed.) Academic Discourse. London: Longman, 57-75.
Casañ-Pitarch, R. 2017. “A Proposal for Genre Analysis: The AMS model”. Epic Series In Language And Linguistics, 2, 235-246. DOI: 10.29007/hbg9
Connor, U. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Didau, D. 2013. “Black space: improving writing by increasing lexical density”. The Learning Spy: Brain Food for the Thinking Teacher.
Didau, D. 3 January 2019 Black space: improving writing by increasing lexical density <https://learningspy.co.uk/writing/black-space-increasing-lexical-density/>
DuBay, W. H. 2007. Smart Language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text. Costa Mesa, Calif.: Impact Information.
Dudley-Evans, T. and St John, M. J. 1998. Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge university press.
Firkins, A., Forey, G. and Sengupta, S. 2007. “Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students”. ELT journal, 61 (4), 341-352.
Genre. 2018. In Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 15 November 2018 <https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/genre>
Glowalla, U. and Colonius, H. 1982. “Toward a model of macrostructure search”. Advances in Psychology, 8, 111-123. North-Holland.
Heylighen, F. and Dewaele, J. M. 1999. “Formality of language: definition, measurement and behavioral determinants”. Interner Bericht, Center “Leo Apostel”, Vrije Universiteit Brüssel.
IMDb Contribution. 15 November 2018. <https://contribute.imdb.com/czone/?ref_=helpms_ch_ci_history>
Kendall, P. 2018. Biography. 15 October 2019. <https://www.britannica.com/art/biography-narrative-genre>
Paltridge, B. 2012. “Genre and English for specific purposes”. The handbook of English for specific purposes, 347-366.
Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S. 2007. Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language. London: Routledge.
Press Room. 15 November 2018 <https://www.imdb.com/pressroom/about/>
Ruiz-Moneva, M. A. 2011. “Some Proposals to Cope with Forms of Irony Typically Found in Literary Texts from a Relevance-Theoretical Perspective”. Studies in Literature and Language, 2 (2), 127-156.
Sinclair, S. and Rockwell, G. 2019. Voyant-Tools. 18 January 2019 <https://voyant-tools.org/>.
Swales J. M. 1988. Episodes in ESP. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. 2011. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings (13th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. 1981. “Aspects of article Introductions”. Aston ESP Research Reports, 1. Birmingham, UK: Language Studies Unit, The University of Aston. Republished University of Michigan Press 2011.
Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S. and Ickes, V. 1981. “On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers”. The ESP Journal, 1, 123-140.
Taylor, G. and Chen, T. 1991. “Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts”. Applied Linguistics, 1, 319-336.
Trimble, L. 1985. English for Science and Technology. A Discourse Approach, Cambridge Language Teaching Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk Teun, A. 1995. “On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions. A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van Dijk theory”. In Weaver III, C. A., Mannes, S., and Fletcher, C. R. (Eds.) Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. New York: Routledge, 383-410.