Proper name vocatives in conflictive partner interaction
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this article is to determine the values of the proper noun vocative in the conflictive conversation of sentimental couples. It is assumed that conflictive communicative exchanges in couples are a linguistic reflection of their relational behavior. To analyze these vocative values, a corpus of spontaneous conversations of five spontaneous couples was used. show that the vocative has contextual values and, in couple disputes, acts as a regulator of interaction as well as an index of the epistemic stance of the speakers.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An open-access CREATIVE COMMONS copyright license is used. Those authors whose works are published by this journal, accept the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right to first publish their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License CC BY SA that allows third parties to share the work, provided that its author and first publication is indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematics file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work over the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematics files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase quotes of the published work.
Funding data
-
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Grant numbers PID2020-114805GB-I00;MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ -
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Grant numbers MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033
References
Ackermann, Tanja (2023). Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests. Politeness Res. 2023; 19 (2): 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0034
Albelda, Marta; Briz, Antonio; Cestero, Ana M; Kotwica, Dorota y Cristina Villalba (2014). Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español (es.por.atenuacion). Oralia Vol. 17 (2014): 7-62, https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v17i.7999
Albelda, Marta (2022). Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 10(3), 176-199. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.011
Albelda, Marta (2024). Factores comunicativos agravadores y moderadores del conflicto de pareja. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, Vol. 35. https://doi.org/
6035/clr.7843
Alonso-Cortés, Ángel (1999a). Las expresiones exclamativas. La interjección y las expresiones vocativas. En Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte (Eds.), Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3. (pp. 3993-4213) Espasa-Calpe.
Alonso-Cortés, Ángel (1999b). La exclamación en español. Estudio sintáctico y pragmático. Minerva Ediciones.
Bañón, Antonio Miguel (1993). El vocativo en español. Propuestas para su análisis lingüístico. Octaedro Universidad.
Bowlby, J. (1981). Attachment and loss. Penguin Books.
Briz, Antonio (en prensa). Los conflictos en la conversación coloquial entre familiares, amigos o conocidos.
Butler, Carly. W., Danby, Susan y Michael Emmison (2011). Address terms in turn beginnings: managing disalignment and disaffiliation in telephone counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44, 338-358. https://doi.org/
1080/08351813.2011.619311
Clancy, Brian (2018). Conflict in corpora: Investigating family conflict sequences using a corpus pragmatic approach. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00011.cla
Clayman, Steven. E. (2010). Address terms in the service of other actions: the case of news interview discourse. Discourse and Communication 4 (2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310364330
Clayman, Steven E. (2012) Address Terms in the Organization of Turns at Talk: The Case of Pivotal Turn Extensions. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1853-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.001
Clayman, Steven E. (2013) Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms. Journal of Pragmatics 57: 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.pragma.2012.12.001
Cuenca, Maria Josep (2004). El Receptor en el text: el vocatiu. Estudis Romànics, (26), 39-64, https://raco.cat/index.php/Estudis/article/view/237692
Cuenca, Maria Josep (2013). Uso del vocativo en la entrevista política: género discursivo y (des)cortesía. Discurso y sociedad, 7(3) 522-552. http://www.dissoc.org/
es/ediciones/v07n03/DS7(3)Cuenca.pdf
Estellés Arguedas, Maria (2023). Visualizando el conflict discursive a través de la expresión fónica: un estudio a partir de dos conversaciones. Normas, Vol. 13 (1), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.7203/Normas.v13i1.27986
The perception of conflict in everyday conversation. Normas.
García, Amparo. (2018). Primacía epistémica en géneros interaccionales: atenuación, intensificación y territorio. Rilce. Revista De Filología Hispánica, 34(3), 1336-64. https://doi.org/10.15581/008.34.3.1336-64
Gras, Pedro (2013): Entre la gramática y el discurso: valores conectivos de «que» inicial átono en español. n Jacob, Daniel; Ploog, Katia (coords.), Autour de que. El entorno de que, (pp. 89-112). Peter Lang.
Greenman, P. S., y Johnson, S. M. (2013). Process research on emotionally focused therapy (EFT) for couples: Linking theory to practice. Family Process, 52(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12015
Haverkate, Henk (1979). Impositive sentences in Spain, North-Holland Publishing Company.
Heritage, John y Geoffrey Raymond (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
Heritage, John (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Hirata, Ichiro (2023) Implicatures of proper name vocatives in English. Journal of Pragmatics 207: 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.001
Johnson, Susan M., Hunsley, John, Greenberg, Leslie, y Schindler, Dwayne (1999). Emotionally focused couples therapy: Status and challenges. Clinical psychology: Science and practice, 6(1), 67.
Johnson, Susan M. (2012). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Routledge.
Kaul, Silvia (2017). Tipos de descortesía verbal y emociones en contextos de cultura hispanohablante. Pragmática Sociocultural, 5(1), 119-123. https://doi.org/
1515/soprag-2017-0001
Kienpointner, Manfred (2008). Cortesía, emociones y argumentación. En A. Briz et al. (Eds.), Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral (pp. 25-52). Universidad de Valencia.
Kleinknecht, Friederike and Miguel Souza (2017). Vocatives as a source category for pragmatic markers. From deixis to discourse marking via affectivity. En C. Fedriani and A. (Eds.), Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives (pp. 257-287). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/
1075/slcs.186.10kle
Lerner, Gene. H. (2023) Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation in context-free organization. Language in Society 32: 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X
McCarthy, Michael J and Anne O’Keeffe (2003) What’s in a name? - vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. Language and Computers, 46 (1) 153-185. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334410_010
Muntigl, Peter y William Turnbull (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9
Muntigl, Peter (2009 Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges. Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language 16:2. 225-263. https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.16.2.03MUN
Papp, Lauren M., Kouros, Chrystyna D. and E. Mark. Cummings (2009) Demand-withdraw patterns in marital conflict in the home. Personal Relationships, 16 (2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348810
Plasencia, Maria Elena, Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina y Palma-Fahey, Maria (2015) Nominal address and rapport management in informal interactions among university students in Quito (Ecuador), Santiago (Chile) and Seville (Spain). Multilingua – Journal of Cross-cultural and Interlanguage Communication 34 (4), 547-575. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0107
Raymond, Geoffrey y John Heritage (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35. 677–705. https://doi.org/
1017/S0047404506060325
Rendle-Short, Johanna (2007), «Catherine, you’re wasting your time»: Address terms within the Australian political interview, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 9, 1503-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006
Scott, Suzanne (2002). Linguistic feature variation within disagreements: An empirical investigation. Text 22(2): 301-328. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.011
Sifianou, Maria (2019). Conflict, disagreement and (im)politeness. En M. Evans et al. (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict (pp. 176-195). Routledge.
Ton, Thoai Nu Linh (2019) A literature review of address studies from pragmatic and sociolinguistic perspectives. En B. Kluge & M. I: Moyna (Eds.), It’s not all about you: New perspectives on address research, (pp. 23-46) John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.5.16vis
Vismans, Roel (2023). Address and politeness. En N. Baumgarten y R. Vismans (Eds.) It’s different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research, (pp. 397-422). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.1.01ton