X Never Mind Y: un enfocament cognitiu dins del context de les construccions d' alternança complementària
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Publicades:
de maig 15, 2024
Paraules clau:
Construcció discursiva, alternança complementària, Operacions cognitives, Construcció del significat.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resum
Les construccions d'alternança complementària són emparellaments de forma i significat que s'utilitzen per vincular dos estats de coses diferents de manera que el segon element se suma al primer basant-se en el judici subjectiu del parlant, com en "No puc permetre'm un cotxe de luxe, i molt menys un jet privat". Altres construccions d'aquesta família inclouen connectors com much less, never mind i to say nothing of (Iza Erviti, 2015). Cadascuna d' aquestes configuracions exhibeix una varietat de propietats de significat distintives dins l' espectre de l'alternança complementària. Aquest estudi sosté que els diversos significats atribuïts a aquestes construccions són el resultat de l' activació de diferents operacions cognitives. Per donar suport a aquesta afirmació, aquest article presenta un estudi exhaustiu de la construcció X Never Mind Y, revelant com les diferents operacions cognitives subjacents afecten la naturalesa de les connexions intratextuals que crea i els efectes de significat que transmet. A més, aquest article aclareix per què aquesta construcció és aplicable en una àmplia varietat de contextos. Aquestes troballes donen suport a una classificació novedosa de les construccions d'alternança complementària basada en les operacions cognitives involucrades en les construccions.
Descàrregues
Les dades de descàrrega encara no estan disponibles.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Com citar
Iza Erviti, A. (2024). X Never Mind Y: un enfocament cognitiu dins del context de les construccions d’ alternança complementària. Cultura, Lenguaje Y Representación, 33, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.7550
Número
Secció
ARTÍCULOS / ARTICLES
S'utilitza una llicència de drets d'autor CREATIVE COMMONS d'accés obert. Aquells autors les obres dels quals siguin publicades per aquesta revista, accepten els termes següents:
- a. Els autors conservaran els seus drets d'autor i garantiran a la revista el dret a publicar primer la seva obra, que estarà simultàniament subjecta a la Llicència de Reconeixement Creative Commons CC BY SA que permet a tercers compartir l'obra sempre que s'indiqui el seu autor i la seva primera publicació.
- b. Els autors podran adoptar altres contractes de llicència no exclusius per a la distribució de la versió publicada de l'obra (per exemple, dipositar-la en un arxiu telemàtic institucional o publicar-la en un volum monogràfic) sempre que s'indiqui la publicació inicial en aquesta revista.
- Els autors poden -i es recomana- difondre la seva obra a través d'Internet (per exemple, en arxius telemàtics institucionals o a la seva pàgina web) abans i durant el procés de presentació, la qual cosa pot produir intercanvis interessants i augmentar les citacions de l'obra publicada.
##plugins.generic.funding.fundingData##
-
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
##plugins.generic.funding.funderGrants## PID2020-118349GB-I00
Referències
Baicchi, Annalisa. & Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2018). Genre as cognitive construction: An analysis of discourse connectors in academic lectures. Pragmatics & Cognition, 25(3), 576-601. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19006.bai
Bender, Emily. M. & Kathol, Andreas. (2001). Constructional effects of Just because... doesn’t mean... BLS 27, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.1089
Brdar, Mario. (2015). Metonymic chains and synonymy. Fluminensia, 27(2), 83–101.
Davies, Mark. (2004). BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
Davies, Mark. (2008). Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Fillmore, Charles. J., Kay, Paul. & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3), 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
Hannay, Mike., Martínez Caro, Elena. & Mackenzie, J.Lachlan. (2014). Besides as a connective. In M. Gómez González, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. Gonzálvez-García & A. Downing (Eds.), The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications (pp. 223–242). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.12han
Hilpert, Martin. (2007).Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguisticperspective on body-part terms. In G. Radden, K.M. Köpcke, T. Berg, P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 77–98). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.07hil
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2015). Complementary alternation discourse constructions in English: A preliminary study. IJES (International Journal of English Studies) 1(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/194941
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2017a). An exploratory study of complementary contrastive discourse constructions in English. Revista española de lingüística aplicada/Spanish journal of applied linguistics 30(1), 208–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.09iza
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2017b). The family of English contrast constructions at discourse level. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.), Cognitive modelling in language and discourse across cultures (pp. 137–152). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2021). Discourse constructions in English: meaning, form and hierarchies. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71680-6
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George., & Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Noordman, Leo (2001). On the production of causal-contrastive although- sentences in context. In T. J. M. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 153-180). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.09noo
Panther, Klaus Uwe. & Thornburg, Linda (2003). The EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy in English grammar. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 215-232). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.215
Quirk, Randolph., Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey. & Svartvik, Jan. (Eds.). (1991). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006549
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco.J. (2008). Cross-linguistic analysis, secondlanguage teaching and cognitive semantics: The case of Spanish diminutives andreflexive constructions. In S. De Knop & T. D. Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: Volume in honor of René Dirven (pp. 121–152). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.2.121
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco. J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (Cognitive Processing 28) (pp. 103–124). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco. J. (2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse, (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.009
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco. J. & Galera, Alicia. (2014). Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45
WebCorp: The Web as Corpus. Available online at http://www.webcorp.org.uk/live/
Wilson, Deirdre. & Sperber, Dan. (2012). Meaning and relevance. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370
Bender, Emily. M. & Kathol, Andreas. (2001). Constructional effects of Just because... doesn’t mean... BLS 27, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.1089
Brdar, Mario. (2015). Metonymic chains and synonymy. Fluminensia, 27(2), 83–101.
Davies, Mark. (2004). BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
Davies, Mark. (2008). Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Fillmore, Charles. J., Kay, Paul. & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3), 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
Hannay, Mike., Martínez Caro, Elena. & Mackenzie, J.Lachlan. (2014). Besides as a connective. In M. Gómez González, F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. Gonzálvez-García & A. Downing (Eds.), The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications (pp. 223–242). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.12han
Hilpert, Martin. (2007).Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar: A cross-linguisticperspective on body-part terms. In G. Radden, K.M. Köpcke, T. Berg, P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 77–98). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.07hil
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2015). Complementary alternation discourse constructions in English: A preliminary study. IJES (International Journal of English Studies) 1(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/194941
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2017a). An exploratory study of complementary contrastive discourse constructions in English. Revista española de lingüística aplicada/Spanish journal of applied linguistics 30(1), 208–237. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.09iza
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2017b). The family of English contrast constructions at discourse level. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.), Cognitive modelling in language and discourse across cultures (pp. 137–152). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Iza Erviti, Aneider. (2021). Discourse constructions in English: meaning, form and hierarchies. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71680-6
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George., & Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Noordman, Leo (2001). On the production of causal-contrastive although- sentences in context. In T. J. M. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 153-180). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.09noo
Panther, Klaus Uwe. & Thornburg, Linda (2003). The EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy in English grammar. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 215-232). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677.215
Quirk, Randolph., Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey. & Svartvik, Jan. (Eds.). (1991). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006549
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco.J. (2008). Cross-linguistic analysis, secondlanguage teaching and cognitive semantics: The case of Spanish diminutives andreflexive constructions. In S. De Knop & T. D. Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: Volume in honor of René Dirven (pp. 121–152). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.2.121
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco. J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (Cognitive Processing 28) (pp. 103–124). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.06rui
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco. J. (2017). Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: from basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse, (pp. 138–159). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.009
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco. J. & Galera, Alicia. (2014). Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45
WebCorp: The Web as Corpus. Available online at http://www.webcorp.org.uk/live/
Wilson, Deirdre. & Sperber, Dan. (2012). Meaning and relevance. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370