Stance matrices licensing that-clauses and interpersonal meaning in nineteenth-century women's instructive writing in English
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este trabajo aborda el estudio de las matrices que introducen las that-clauses en un corpus de textos instructivos escritos por mujeres en el siglo XIX, y recopilados como COWITE19. Las matrices pueden mostrar aspectos tan diversos como la evaluación, la implicación y la comprensión que los autores hacen de la información enmarcada por dichas matrices. En otras palabras, el uso de estos dispositivos revela la estimación que los autores hacen de su propio texto, al tiempo que permiten transmitir una amplia gama de significados interpersonales, si no podemos descartar fácilmente su potencial organizador como marcadores textuales. El tipo de matrices estudiadas en este texto son las que preceden a las that-clauses y que, por lo general, llevan la información que designa la postura y la implicación de las autoras. Los datos utilizados para ilustrar las formas que presentan estas cláusulas y sus funciones proceden de un análisis de todos los casos encontrados en el Corpus of Women's Instructive Texts in English (1550-1900) (COWITE); para este trabajo, sólo se ha considerado el subcorpus del siglo XIX, esto es, COWITE19. Este corpus se compone en su totalidad de textos instructivos escritos por mujeres en el siglo XIX. Las conclusiones revelan que, a pesar de que el corpus incluye básicamente recetas en una gran variedad de registros, la posición acreditada de las mujeres en sus áreas de especialización se pone claramente de manifiesto en las matrices analizadas para transmitir una serie de significados interpersonales que señalan claramente la experiencia de las escritoras y su buen dominio de los contenidos y de las técnicas que se relatan.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Datos de los fondos
-
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Números de la subvención PID2021-125928NB-I00
Citas
Primary sources
Beeton, M. (1875). The Englishwoman’s cookery book : being a collection of economical recipes taken from her “Book of household management.” London: Ward, Lock, and Co.
Mrs. Bliss of Boston. (1850). The Practical Cook Book: Containing Upwards of One Thousand Receipts ... Lippincott, Grambo & Co.
Campbell, H. (1893). In foreign kitchens: with choice recipes from England, France, Germany, Italy, and the North. Boston: Robert Brothers.
Child, L. M. (1841). The American Frugal Housewife: Dedicated to Those who are Not Ashamed of Economy. New York: Samuel S. & W. Wood.
Cobbett, A. (1835). The English Housekeeper: Or, Manual of Domestic Management, Etc. London: Anne Cobbett.
Copley, E. (1825). The cook’s complete guide, on the principles of frugality, comfort, and elegance : including the art of carving and the most approved method of setting-out a table, explained by numerous copper-plate engravings : instructions for preserving health and att. London: George Virtue.
Cust, M. A. B. L. (1853). The invalid’s own book: a collection of recipes from various books and various countries by the honourable Lady Cust. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Distinction, A L. of. (1830). The Mirror of the Graces: Or, The English Lady’s Costume. Containing General Instructions for Combining Elegance, Simplicity, and Economy with Fashion in Dress; Hints on Female Accomplishments and Manners; and Directions for the Preservation of Health and. Edinburgh: A. Black.
Haslehurst, P. (1814). The family friend, and young woman’s companion; or, housekeeper’s instructor : containing a very complete collection of original and approved receipts in every branch of cookery, confectionery, &c. &c. Sheffield: Printed by C. & W. Thompson.
Hill, G. (1863). The Lady’s Dessert Book: A Calendar for the Use of Hosts and Housekeepers, Containing Recipes, Bills of Fare, and Dessert Arrangements for the Whole Year. London: Richard Bentley.
Holland, M. (1825). The complete economical cook and frugal housewife. London: T. Tegg.
Hooper, M. (1883). Every day meals : being economic and wholesome recipes for breakfast, luncheon, and supper. London: Kegan Paul, Trench,.
Lees-Dods, M. (1886). Handbook of practical cookery: with an introduction on the philosophy of cookery. London: T. Nelson and Sons.
Leslie, E. (1854). New Receipts for Cooking. Philadelphia: T. B. Peterson.
Mason, M. A. B. (1871). The Young Housewife’s Counsellor and Friend: Containing Directions in Every Department of Housekeeping, Including the Duties of Wife and Mother. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Company.
Randolph, M. (1824). The Virginia house-wife. Washington: Printed by Davis and Force.
Smith, P. (1831). Modern American Cookery ... With a list of family medical recipes, and a valuable miscellany. New York: J. & J. HARPER.
Toogood, H. (1866). Treasury of French Cookery: A Collection of the Best French Recipes Arranged and Adapted for English Households. London: Richard
Secondary sources
Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019
Alonso-Almeida, F. (2013). Genre conventions in English recipes, 1600–1800. In: M. DiMeo and S. Pennell (Eds.) Reading and writing recipe books, 1550–1800 (pp. 68-92). Manchester University Press. DOI: 10.7765/9781526129901.00011.
Alonso-Almeida, F. (2015). On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1), 33-57. doi:10.1515/ip-2015-0002
Alonso-Almeida, F. and Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2021a) Evaluative that structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In: I. Moskowich, I. Lareo, and G. Camiña (Eds.), “All families and genera.” Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (pp. 228-247). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1075/z.237.12alo.
Alonso-Almeida, F. & Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2021b) Impoliteness in women’s specialised writing in seventeenth-century English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 22(1): 121–152. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.20004.alo.
Alonso-Almeida, F. & Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Constructing legitimation in Scottish newspapers: The case of the independence referendum. Discourse Studies, 21(6), 621-635. DOI: 10.1177/1461445619866982.
Alonso-Almeida, F., Ortega-Barrera, I., Álvarez-Gil, F., & Quintana-Toledo, E. (Eds.) (2023). COWITE19= Corpus of Women’s Instructive Writing, 1800-1899. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2018). Adverbs ending in -ly in late Modern English. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of History English texts. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2022). Stance devices in tourism-related research articles: A corpus-based study. Peter Lang Verlag. DOI: 10.3726/b20000.
Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2019) An analysis of certainly and generally in Late-Modern English English history texts. Research in Language 17(2): 179-195. DOI: 10.2478/rela-2019-0011.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Caffi, C. (2007). Mitigation. Elsevier.
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2012). A contrastive analysis of epistemic modality in scientific English. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, 18, 115-132.
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in the use of modal verbs in academic English. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 27(1),153–166
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2016). Mitigation of claims in medical research papers: A comparative study of English- and Spanish-language writers. Communication and Medicine, 13(3), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.28424
Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 261-272). Ablex.
Charles, M. (2007). Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 203-218. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
Clift, R. (2006). Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), 569-595. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
Estellés, M. & Albelda Marco, M. (2018). On the dynamicity of evidential scales. In C. Bates Figueras and A. Cabedo Nebot (Eds.), Perspectives on evidentiality in Spanish. Explorations across genres (pp. 25-48). John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns.290.02est
Fox, B. A. (2008). Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and rntitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 11, 167-92. doi:10.1525/jlin.2001.11.2.167
Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. Taylor & Francis.
Johnstone, B. (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 29-71). Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. doi:10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2005b). Metadiscourse. Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K & Jiang, F. K. (2018a). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. K. (2018b). ‘We Believe That … ’: Changes in an Academic Stance Marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139-161. doi:10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2005a). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1): 39-63. doi:10.1075/fol.12.1.03hyl
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005b). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123-139. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
Jalilifar, A, Hayati, S. & Don, A. (2018). Investigating metadiscourse markers in book reviews and blurbs: A study of interested and disinterested genres. Studies About Languages, 33, 90-107. doi:10.5755/j01.sal.33.0.19415
Kendall, K. (2004). Framing authority: Gender, face, and mitigation at a radio network. Discourse and Society, 15(1), 55-79. doi:10.1177/0957926504038946
Kim, C. & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, article 100775. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100775
Langacker, R. W. (2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.
Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2011). Epistemic legitimizing strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse. Discourse studies, 13(6), 789-797. doi:10.1177/1461445611421360c
Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford University Press.
Mauranen, A. & Bondi, M. (2003). Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 269-271. doi:10.1016/s1475-1585(03)00045-6
Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4); 327-341. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3
Werlich, E. (1976). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse–What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349-368. doi:10.1057/sub.2013.13