Indicators as technology of governance in rural areas: synthesis and casesIndicators as technology of governance in rural areas: synthesis and cases
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 29, 2020
Keywords:
Indicators, governance technology, rural proofing, synthetic indicators
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent decades, indicators have become an essential governance technology for policy development at all levels. In the case of rural areas, indicators are used to determine access to funding, to assess their development, to compare them with other areas, or to integrate them into broader political strategies. This paper presents a synthesis of the main approaches to the issue of governance by indicators (indicators as a technology of governance, social indicators) and their implications for rural areas (rural proofing). Likewise, different systems of international indicators (Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda) and local indicators (territorial indicators of Aragon, ISDT) are analysed in order to determine their thematic and methodological suitability for making visible, generating standards, drawing comparisons and involving communities in the analysis of their situation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Jiménez Martínez, Lorién. 2020. “Indicators As Technology of Governance in Rural Areas: Synthesis and CasesIndicators As Technology of Governance in Rural Areas: Synthesis and Cases”. Kult-ur 7 (14). https://doi.org/10.6035/Kult-ur.2020.7.14.3.
Section
Àgora
.png)
All the contents of kult-ur journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise indicated. Click to see basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of this license CC BY-SA 4.0 must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
References
Abreu, I., Nunes, J. M., y Mesias, F. J. (2019). Can Rural Development Be Measured? Design and Application of a Synthetic Index to Portuguese Municipalities. Social Indicators Research, 145(3), 1107-1123. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02124-w
Andersson, A., Höjgård, S., y Rabinowicz, E. (2017). Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes. Land Use Policy, 67, 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.002
Asamblea General de NU. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Naciones Unidas.
Bryden, J. M. (2003). Rural Development Indicators and Diversity in the European Union.
- (2006). Changes in Rural Policy and Governance: The Broader Context. Continuity or Transformation? Perspectives on Rural Development in the Nordic Countries. Estocolmo.
Cobb, C. W., y Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons Learned from the History of Social Indicators. Redefining Progress. San Francisco.
Conferencia Europea sobre Desarrollo Rural. (1996). Hacia una política integrada de desarrollo rural:la declaración de Cork. Unión Europea.
Cors-Iglesias, M., Gómez-Martín, M. B., y Armesto-López, X. A. (2020). Peer-to-Peer Accommodation in Rural Areas of Catalonia: Defining Typologies of Rural Municipalities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156145
Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., y Merry, S. E. (2012). Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review, 46(1), 71-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00473.x
Dax, T. (2014). The evolution of European Rural Policy. En Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe: The Relational Turn in Rural Development. Routledge.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. 2017. «Technical Handbook on the monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy 2014-2020».
Edwards, Bill, Mark Goodwin, Simon Pemberton, y Michael Woods. 2001. «Partnerships, Power, and Scale in Rural Governance». Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(2):289-310. doi: 10.1068/c12m.
Erkkilä, T., y Piironen, O. (2018). Theory: Rankings as Policy Instruments. En Rankings and Global Knowledge Governance: Higher Education, Innovation and Competitiveness (pp. 19-50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68941-8_2
Eurostat. (2019). Adult Education Survey (AES) methodology—Statistics Explained. Adult Education Survey (AES) methodology.
Farinós i Dasí, J. (2008). Gobernanza territorial para el desarrollo sostenible: Estado de la cuestión y agenda. Boletín de la AGE, 46, 11-32.
Gobierno de Aragón (2014) Decreto por el que se aprueba la Estrategia de Ordenación Territorial de Aragón, Pub. L. No. 202/2014, 243 BOA, Boletín Oficial de Aragón 39050 (2014).
Gobierno de Aragón. (2017a). Directriz Especial de Política Demográfica contra la Despoblación—TOMO II. ESTRATEGIAS Y MEDIDAS. Dirección General de Ordenación del Territorio.
Gobierno de Aragón. (2017b). —TOMO III. INDICADORES. Dirección General de Ordenación del Territorio.
Land, K. C., y Michalos, A. C. (2018). Fifty Years After the Social Indicators Movement: Has the Promise Been Fulfilled? Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 835-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1571-y
Little, Jo. 2001. «New Rural Governance?» Progress in Human Geography 25(1):97-102. doi: 10.1191/030913201670015309.
Martínez Navarro, J. M., y Vázquez Varela, C. (2016). Desarrollo rural endógeno, comunidad, participación e identidad: Luces y sombras en el marco de la iniciativa LEADER. IX Coloquio Nacional de Desarrollo Local del GTDL-AGE, 655-674.
Ministerio de Igualdad. (2019). Macroencuesta de Violencia contra la Mujer 2019—Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Género. Ministerio de Igualdad.
Navarro, F., Cejudo, E., y Maroto, J. C. (2014). Reflexiones en torno a la participación en el desarrollo rural. ¿Reparto social o reforzamiento del poder? LEADER y PRODER en el sur de España. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 40(121), Article 121.
Oliva Serrano, Jesús. 2018a. «Conclusiones para la investigación y la gobernanza rural». Pp. 179-92 en Movilidades, trayectorias vitales y sostenibilidad rural. Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Oliva Serrano, Jesús. 2018b. Movilidades, trayectorias vitales y sostenibilidad rural. Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Parris, Kevin. 2001. «Measuring the Environmental Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Challenges, Recent Trends and Outlook, and Future Directions». P. 41 en The Common Agriculture Policy and the Environmental Challenge -New Tasks for the Public Administrations?”. Maastricht, The Netherlands: European Institute of Public Administration.
Pe’er, Guy, Aletta Bonn, Helge Bruelheide, Petra Dieker, Nico Eisenhauer, Peter H. Feindt, Gregor Hagedorn, Bernd Hansjürgens, Irina Herzon, Ângela Lomba, Elisabeth Marquard, Francisco Moreira, Heike Nitsch, Rainer Oppermann, Andrea Perino, Norbert Röder, Christian Schleyer, Stefan Schindler, Christine Wolf, Yves Zinngrebe, y Sebastian Lakner. 2020. «Action Needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to Address Sustainability Challenges». People and Nature 2(2):305-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080.
REDR. (2020). Posicionamiento REDR: Plan Estratégico Nacional PAC y LEADER 2021-2027. Red Española de Desarrollo Rural. http://www.redr.es/es/portal.do?TR=A&IDR=1&identificador=929
Rico, M., y Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2011). Propuesta metodológica para la construcción de indicadores sintéticos de igualdad de género. El caso del medio rural de Castilla y León. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69(1), 253-286. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.04.27
Schuh, B., Lukesch, R., Michaelk, J., Kaufmann, P., Pufahl, A., Schiller, S., Koorberg, P., Beaufoy, G., Pinay, G., Moran, D., Gomann, H., Storti, D., Rossi, P., y Paracchini, M.-L. (2011). Approaches for assessing the impacts of the Rural Development Programmes in the context of multiple intervening factors. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) > 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy, 16. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.99365
Sherry, E., y Shortall, S. (2018). Rural Proofing in Northern Ireland—Overview and Recommendations. Agrifoods and Bioscience Institute-
- (2019). Methodological fallacies and perceptions of rural disparity: How rural proofing addresses real versus abstract needs. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.005
Shortall, S., y Alston, M. (2016). To Rural Proof or Not to Rural Proof: A Comparative Analysis. Politics & Policy, 44(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12144
Subirats, J. (2008). Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Ariel.
Wieck, Christine, y Isabell Hausmann. 2019. «Indicators Everywhere: The New Accountability of Agricultural Policy?» en AgEcon Search. Bruxelles.
Andersson, A., Höjgård, S., y Rabinowicz, E. (2017). Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes. Land Use Policy, 67, 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.002
Asamblea General de NU. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Naciones Unidas.
Bryden, J. M. (2003). Rural Development Indicators and Diversity in the European Union.
- (2006). Changes in Rural Policy and Governance: The Broader Context. Continuity or Transformation? Perspectives on Rural Development in the Nordic Countries. Estocolmo.
Cobb, C. W., y Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons Learned from the History of Social Indicators. Redefining Progress. San Francisco.
Conferencia Europea sobre Desarrollo Rural. (1996). Hacia una política integrada de desarrollo rural:la declaración de Cork. Unión Europea.
Cors-Iglesias, M., Gómez-Martín, M. B., y Armesto-López, X. A. (2020). Peer-to-Peer Accommodation in Rural Areas of Catalonia: Defining Typologies of Rural Municipalities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156145
Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., y Merry, S. E. (2012). Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review, 46(1), 71-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00473.x
Dax, T. (2014). The evolution of European Rural Policy. En Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe: The Relational Turn in Rural Development. Routledge.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. 2017. «Technical Handbook on the monitoring and evaluation framework of the common agricultural policy 2014-2020».
Edwards, Bill, Mark Goodwin, Simon Pemberton, y Michael Woods. 2001. «Partnerships, Power, and Scale in Rural Governance». Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(2):289-310. doi: 10.1068/c12m.
Erkkilä, T., y Piironen, O. (2018). Theory: Rankings as Policy Instruments. En Rankings and Global Knowledge Governance: Higher Education, Innovation and Competitiveness (pp. 19-50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68941-8_2
Eurostat. (2019). Adult Education Survey (AES) methodology—Statistics Explained. Adult Education Survey (AES) methodology.
Farinós i Dasí, J. (2008). Gobernanza territorial para el desarrollo sostenible: Estado de la cuestión y agenda. Boletín de la AGE, 46, 11-32.
Gobierno de Aragón (2014) Decreto por el que se aprueba la Estrategia de Ordenación Territorial de Aragón, Pub. L. No. 202/2014, 243 BOA, Boletín Oficial de Aragón 39050 (2014).
Gobierno de Aragón. (2017a). Directriz Especial de Política Demográfica contra la Despoblación—TOMO II. ESTRATEGIAS Y MEDIDAS. Dirección General de Ordenación del Territorio.
Gobierno de Aragón. (2017b). —TOMO III. INDICADORES. Dirección General de Ordenación del Territorio.
Land, K. C., y Michalos, A. C. (2018). Fifty Years After the Social Indicators Movement: Has the Promise Been Fulfilled? Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 835-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1571-y
Little, Jo. 2001. «New Rural Governance?» Progress in Human Geography 25(1):97-102. doi: 10.1191/030913201670015309.
Martínez Navarro, J. M., y Vázquez Varela, C. (2016). Desarrollo rural endógeno, comunidad, participación e identidad: Luces y sombras en el marco de la iniciativa LEADER. IX Coloquio Nacional de Desarrollo Local del GTDL-AGE, 655-674.
Ministerio de Igualdad. (2019). Macroencuesta de Violencia contra la Mujer 2019—Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Género. Ministerio de Igualdad.
Navarro, F., Cejudo, E., y Maroto, J. C. (2014). Reflexiones en torno a la participación en el desarrollo rural. ¿Reparto social o reforzamiento del poder? LEADER y PRODER en el sur de España. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 40(121), Article 121.
Oliva Serrano, Jesús. 2018a. «Conclusiones para la investigación y la gobernanza rural». Pp. 179-92 en Movilidades, trayectorias vitales y sostenibilidad rural. Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Oliva Serrano, Jesús. 2018b. Movilidades, trayectorias vitales y sostenibilidad rural. Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Parris, Kevin. 2001. «Measuring the Environmental Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Challenges, Recent Trends and Outlook, and Future Directions». P. 41 en The Common Agriculture Policy and the Environmental Challenge -New Tasks for the Public Administrations?”. Maastricht, The Netherlands: European Institute of Public Administration.
Pe’er, Guy, Aletta Bonn, Helge Bruelheide, Petra Dieker, Nico Eisenhauer, Peter H. Feindt, Gregor Hagedorn, Bernd Hansjürgens, Irina Herzon, Ângela Lomba, Elisabeth Marquard, Francisco Moreira, Heike Nitsch, Rainer Oppermann, Andrea Perino, Norbert Röder, Christian Schleyer, Stefan Schindler, Christine Wolf, Yves Zinngrebe, y Sebastian Lakner. 2020. «Action Needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to Address Sustainability Challenges». People and Nature 2(2):305-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10080.
REDR. (2020). Posicionamiento REDR: Plan Estratégico Nacional PAC y LEADER 2021-2027. Red Española de Desarrollo Rural. http://www.redr.es/es/portal.do?TR=A&IDR=1&identificador=929
Rico, M., y Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2011). Propuesta metodológica para la construcción de indicadores sintéticos de igualdad de género. El caso del medio rural de Castilla y León. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69(1), 253-286. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.04.27
Schuh, B., Lukesch, R., Michaelk, J., Kaufmann, P., Pufahl, A., Schiller, S., Koorberg, P., Beaufoy, G., Pinay, G., Moran, D., Gomann, H., Storti, D., Rossi, P., y Paracchini, M.-L. (2011). Approaches for assessing the impacts of the Rural Development Programmes in the context of multiple intervening factors. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) > 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy, 16. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.99365
Sherry, E., y Shortall, S. (2018). Rural Proofing in Northern Ireland—Overview and Recommendations. Agrifoods and Bioscience Institute-
- (2019). Methodological fallacies and perceptions of rural disparity: How rural proofing addresses real versus abstract needs. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.005
Shortall, S., y Alston, M. (2016). To Rural Proof or Not to Rural Proof: A Comparative Analysis. Politics & Policy, 44(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12144
Subirats, J. (2008). Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Ariel.
Wieck, Christine, y Isabell Hausmann. 2019. «Indicators Everywhere: The New Accountability of Agricultural Policy?» en AgEcon Search. Bruxelles.