Transitive phrasal verbs in acquisition and use: A view from construction grammar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Author/s
Beate Hampe
Erfurt University, Germany
ABSTRACT
This paper surveys a number of aspects involved in viewing transitive phrasal verbs as verb-particle constructions in the construction-grammar sense of the term. The two word-order templates Verb-Object-Particle and Verb-Particle-Object, as fully schematic and semantically and pragmatically distinct constructions (Gries 2003), are discussed as members of different construction networks, viz. transitive vs. caused-motion constructions, with a focus on the latter. Moreover, the word-order constructions are distinguished from specific phrasal verbs as “formal idioms”. It is argued that the notion of “allostruction” (Cappelle 2006) can be fruitfully applied only at the intermediate level of the latter.
The first results of a corpus study using data from CHILDES (parts of Manchester, Fletcher), the ICE-GB and parts of the BNC are reported to support the claim that early instances of transitive phrasal verbs exhibiting the word-order Verb-Object-Particle function as precursors (Diessel 2004) to full-blown, lexically and syntactically more complex realisations of the caused-motion construction. In a more explorative and thus also preliminary way, three hierarchical configurational frequency analyses are employed to trace the constellations of selected features of transitive phrasal verbs across different age groups.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bolinger, D. 1971. The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cappelle, B. 2006. “Particle placement and the case for “allostructions””.n
Constructions 1, 28 pgs. <http://elanguage.net/journals/constructions/article/view/22/27>
Diessel, H. 2004. The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. and Tomasello, M. 2005. “Particle placement in early child language: A multifactorial analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (1), 89-111.
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P. and O’Connor, C.M. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let alone”. Language 64 (3), 501-538.
Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. 1988. “Normal language development and language impairment: Syntax and beyond”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2, 97–114.
Givon, T. 1979. “From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy”. In Givon, T. (Ed.) Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 81-112.
Geld, R. and Krevelj, S.L. 2010. “Centrality of space in the strategic construal of up in English particle verbs”. In Brdar, M., M. Omazic, V. Pavicic Takac, T. Gradecak-Erdeljic and G. Buljan (Eds.) Space and Time in Language. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 145-166.
Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. and Jackendoff, R. 2004. “The English resultative as a family of constructions”. Language 80 (3), 532-568.
Gries, S.T. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. A Study of Particle Placement. London/New York: Continuum.
Gries, S.T. 2011. “Acquiring particle placement in English: A corpus-based perspective”. In Medina, P.G. (Ed.) Morphosyntactic Alternations in English: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London/Oakville, CT: Equinox, 235-263.
Gries, S.T., Hampe, B. and Schönefeld, D. 2005. “Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the associations of verbs and constructions”. Cognitive Linguistics 16 (4), 635-676.
Gries, S.T., Hampe, B. and Schönefeld, D. 2010. “Converging evidence II: More on the association between verbs and constructions”. In Rice, S. and J. Newman (Eds.) Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 59-72.
Hampe, B. 1997. “Towards a solution of the phrasal-verb puzzle: Considerations on some scattered pieces”. Lexicology 3 (2), 203-243.
Hampe, B. 2002. Superlative Verbs. A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Redundancy in English Verb-particle Constructions. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Hampe, B. 2011. “Discovering constructions by means of collostruction analysis: The English denominative construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 22 (2), 211-245.
Johnson, M. 1986. A Computer-based Approach to the Analysis of Child Language Data. unpubl . Ph. D. dissertation, Reading, UK: University of Reading.
Lindner, S. J. 1983. A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of English Verb-Particle Constructions with “out” and “up”. (LAUT Paper, no. 101). Trier, Germany: Linguistic Agency of the University of Trier.
Liu, D. 2008. Idioms. Description, Comprehension, Acquisition and Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Morgan, P. 1997. “Figuring out ‘figure out’. Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 14 (2), 15-28.
Ochs, E. 1979. “Planned and unplanned discourse”. In Givon, T. (Ed.) Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 51-80.
Powell, M.J. (1992). Semantic/Pragmatic regularities in informal lexis. Text 12 (1), 19-58.
Schiffrin, D. 2006. “Discourse”. In Fasold, R. and J. Connor-Linton (Eds.) An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169-203.
Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S.T. 2003. “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2), 209-243.
Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V.M., Pine, J.M. and Rowland, C.F. 2001. “The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account”. Journal of Child Language 28, 127-152.
van Dongen, W.A. 1919. “He puts on his hat and He puts his hat on”. Neophilologicus 4, 322-353.