Lexical decomposition of English prepositions and their fusion with verb lexical classes in motion constructions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Author/s
Ignasi Navarro i Ferrando
Universitat Jaume I, Spain
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we firstly present a tentative formalization of a Lexical Template (LT) and a meta-language for spatial particle semantics within the framework of the Lexical Constructional Model (LCM). The semantic module consists of a set of Lexical Functions, which operate on a semantic primitive in order to produce a hyponym by elaborating topological, dynamic and functional information. The syntactic module expresses situations (positions or states) plus the argument structure. Secondly, we illustrate and discuss several LTs with the purpose of exploring spatial particle subsumption constraints with constructions such as caused motion and intransitive motion, as well as the types of verbal Aktionsart that might fuse with them. The COCA is used as a data source. We conclude that spatial particles contribute meaning to the extent that they partially determine the type of Aktionsart of the verb licensed by the motion construction.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Butler, Ch.S. 2009. “The Lexical Constructional Model. Genesis, strengths and challenges”. In Butler Ch.S. and J. Martín Arista, (Eds.) Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 117-151.
Clark, H.H. 1973. “Space, time, semantics and the child”. In Moore, T.E. (Ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. London: Academic Press, 27-64.
Davies, M. © COCA. Corpus of Contemporary American English. <http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/>
Deane, P.D. 1993. “At, by, to, and past: An Essay in Multimodal Image Theory”. BLS, 19, 112-124.
Deane, P.D. 2005. “Multimodal spatial representation: On the semantic unity of over”. In Hampe, B. (Ed.) From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 235-284.
Dik, S.C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar: The Structure of the Clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Faber, P. and Mairal, R. 1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldberg, A.E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mairal, R. 2004. “Reconsidering lexical representations in Role and Reference Grammar”. Proceedings of XXVII International AEDEAN Conference. Universidad de Salamanca.
Mairal, R. and Faber, P. 2005. “Decomposing semantic decomposition”. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar, Taiwan: Academia Sinica, 279-308.
Mairal, R. and Faber, P. 2007. “Lexical templates within a functional cognitive theory of meaning”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 137-172.
Mairal, R. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. 2008. “New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 137-158.
Mairal, R. and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. 2009. “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”. In Butler, Ch.S. and J. Martín Arista (Eds.) Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153 – 198.
Mel’čuk, I., Clas, A. and Polguère, A. 1995. Introduction à la Lexicologie Explicative et Combinatoire. Louvain-la-Neuve (BE) and Aupelf: Duculot–UREF.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Navarro, I. 2000. “A Cognitive–Semantic Analysis of the English Lexical Unit in”. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica, 26, 189-220.
Navarro, I. 2002. “Towards a description of the semantics of AT”. In Cuyckens, H. and G. Radden (Eds.) Perspectives on Prepositions. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 210–230.
Navarro, I. 2003. A Cognitive Semantics Analysis of the English Lexical Units At, On, and In in English. CESCA. < http://www.tdx.cesca.es/TDX-0804103-133233/>
Navarro, I. 2006. “Functional contrasts in spatial meaning”. Studia Universitatis Petru Maior. Series Philologia, 5, 133–144.
Peña, S. 2009. “Constraints on subsumption in the caused-motion construction”. Language Sciences, 31, 740-765.
Pérez-Hernández, L. and Peña-Cervel, S. 2009. “Pragmatic and Cognitive Constraints on Lexical-Constructional Subsumption”. Atlantis, 31 (2), 57-73.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. 1956. The Child’s Conception of Space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and Mairal, R. 2007a. “Challenging systems of lexical representation”. Journal of English Studies, 6, 325-356.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and Mairal, R. 2007b. “Levels of semantic representation: Where lexicon and grammar meet”. Interlingüística, 17, 26-47.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and Mairal, R. 2008. “Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model”. Folia Linguistica, 42 (2), 355-400.
Silvestre, A.J. 2009. “Topology, force-dynamics, and function in the semantics of In and On as the prepositional component of English prepositional verbs”. In Lexical decomposition of English spatial particles and their subsumption in motion constructions.
Valenzuela, J., A. Rojo and C. Soriano (Eds.) Trends in Cognitive Linguistics: Theoretical and Applied Models. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 51-64.
Talmy, L. 2000. “How language structures space”. In Talmy, L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 177-254.
Vandeloise, C. 1994. “Methodology and analyses of the preposition in”. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (2), 157–184.
Vandeloise, C. 2003. “Containment, support, and linguistic relativity”. In Cuyckens, H., R. Dirven and J.R. Taylor (Eds.) Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 393-426.
Vandeloise, C. 2005. “Force and function in the acquisition of the preposition in”. In Carson, L. and E. van der Zee (Eds.) Functional Features in Language and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 219–231.
Van Valin, R.D. Jr. 2005. The Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface: An Introduction to Role and Reference Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1986. (1st ed. 1934). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wierzbička, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.