Changing spaces, expanding mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course

Main Article Content

Heidi Vaarala
Juha Jalkanen

Abstract

Author/s


Heidi Vaarala
Juha Jalkanen

Language Centre, University of Jyväskylä, Finland


 


ABSTRACT


Recent studies in the field of new literacies have indicated that a remarkable change in the way we access, consume and produce information has taken place. The boundaries between concepts such as authorship and ownership have become blurred. The repertoire of texts available to language learners is almost unlimited. One important purpose of language education is to provide students with functional tools to take advantage of these resources.


In this article we discuss the benefits and challenges of teaching L2 reading comprehension in a multimodal learning environment from the perspective of course design. In addition, we attempt to find answers to the following questions: what kinds of assignments are meaningful from the learner’s perspective, and what added value does multimodality bring to a learning situation? A design-based research approach was implemented in this study in order to enable a dialogue between theory and practice.


The students attending the reading comprehension course described in the article were advanced university students from various European countries, who studied Finnish as a second language. In comparison to traditional reading comprehension courses, it seems that L2 learners benefit from reading digital texts and using a web-based learning platform. The digital environment enabled the learners to read meaningful texts and to actively learn through texts and assignments. Moreover, the web-based learning environment enhanced the flexibility of the learning event – flexibility in terms of time, place, course content, and the learners’ language proficiency.


However, the course feedback did not support the view that students would automatically be on the “better” side of the digital divide. Instead, they do need assistance in order to understand the new learning mindsets and especially learner autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vaarala , H. ., & Jalkanen, J. . (2018). Changing spaces, expanding mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course. Language Value, 2(1). Retrieved from https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/index.php/languagevalue/article/view/4739
Section
Articles

References

Attwell, G. 2007. “Personal learning environments - the future of eLearning?” eLearning Papers, 2 (1), 1-8.

Bakhtin, M. 1991. Dostojevskin Poetiikan Ongelmia. Helsinki: Orient Express.

Bakhtin, M. 1996. “Discourse in the novel”. In Bakhtin, M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Slavic Series no. 1. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 259-442.

Barab, S. 2006. “Design-based research. A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist”. In Sawyer R.K. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 153-169.

Barton, D. 1994. Literacy. An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Brackwell.

Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in one Community. London: Routledge.

Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. 2000. “Literacy practice”. In Barton, D., M. Hamilton and R. Ivanič (Eds.) Situated Literacies. Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge, 7-15.

Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanič, R. (Eds.) 2000. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge.

Collins, A., Joseph, D. and Bielaczyc, K. 2004. “Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues”. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 15-42.

Cuban, L. 2001. Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry”. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5-8.

Eagleton, M. and Dobler, E. 2007. Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet Inquiry. London: The Guilford Press.

Ellis, R. 2000. “Task-based research and language pedagogy”. Language Teaching Research, 3 (4), 193-220.

Gee, J.P. 2005. “Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines”. E-Learning, 2 (1), 5-16.

Gee, J.P. 2008. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (3rd ed.). London: Falmer Press.

Gilmore, A. 2007. “Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning”. Language Teaching, 40 (2), 97-118.

Hasan, R. 1996. “Literacy, everyday talk and society”. In Williams, G. and R. Hasan (Eds.) Literacy in Society. London: Longman, 377-424.

Healy, A. 2008. “Expanding student capacities: Learning by design pedagogy”. In Healy, A. (Ed.) Multiliteracies and Diversity in Education: New Pedagogies for Expanding Landscapes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2-29.

Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jenkins, H. 2006. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. MacArthur Foundation white paper.

Johnson, S. 2010. “Yes, people still read, but now It’s social”. The New York Times, June 19th 2010.

Kalantzis, M. and Cope, B. 2004. “Designs for learning”. E-Learning, 1 (1), 38-93.

Kiili, C., Laurinen, L. and Marttunen, M. 2008. ”Students evaluating internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39 (1), 75-95.

Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge.

Kress, G. and Leeuwen, T. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

Kuk, G. 2003. E-learning Hubs: Affordance, Motivation and Learning Outcomes. The BEST Conference: Creativity and Innovation in Academic Practice. Brighton, England.

Laakkonen, I. forthcoming. “Personal learning environments in higher education language courses: An informal and learner-centred approach”. In Thouësny, S. and L. Bradley (Eds.) Second Language Teaching and Learning with Technology.

Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. 2006. New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Linell, P. 1998. Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society. 3. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Linell, P. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte (N.C): IAP-Information Age.

Skehan, P. 1998. “Task-based instruction”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268-286.

Street, B. 1993. “The new literacy studies, guest editorial”. Journal of Research in Reading, 16 (2), 81-97.

Svensson, P. 2008. Språkutbildning i en Digital Värld. Informationsteknik, Kommunikation och Lärande. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.

Taalas, P. 2005. Change in the Making. Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.