Discourse markers and lecture structure: their role in listening Comprehension and EMI lecturer training
Main Article Content
Abstract
Author/s
María Ángeles Martín del Pozo
Universidad de Valladolid, Spain
ABSTRACT
Listening comprehension of lectures in L2 contexts is a widely researched topic. Findings have been applied to both materials and course design. This paper focuses on findings about the facilitative role in comprehension of those discourse markers (DM) which signal lecture structure. These markers can also be of assistance in L2 contexts such as new English Medium Instruction (EMI) scenarios, where the lecturer is not a native speaker of English. A small-scale investigation about the presence of these markers in EMI lecturer discourse is presented. Findings indicate that lecturers need a more overt signalling of lecture phases and a wider stylistic variety enabling them to do so. The paper concludes by suggesting that EAP materials for training students in listening comprehension could be a good resource to provide the lecturer with a repertoire of linguistic tools to structure their lecturers and in consequence facilitate comprehension for students.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bellés-Fortuño, B. 2008. Discourse Markers within the University Lecture Genre: a contrastive study between Spanish and North American Lectures (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Universitat Jaume I: Castellón.
Chaudron, C. and Richards, J.C. 1986. “The effects of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures”. Applied Linguistics 7, 113-125.
Coleman, J. 2006 “English-Medium Teaching in European Higher Education”, Language Teaching 39, 1- 14.
Dafouz, E. and Núñez, B. 2009. “CLIL in higher education: devising a new learning landscape”. In Dafouz, E. and Guerrini, M. (Eds.), CLIL across educational levels. Madrid : Santillana, 101-112.
Dafouz, E. and Núñez, B. 2010. “Metadiscursive devices in university lectures: A constrastive analysis of L1 and L2 performance”. In Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T and U. Smit (eds.) Language Use in Content-and-Language-Integrated Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 213- 233.
Dafouz Milne, E. 2011. “English as the medium of instruction in Spanish contexts: A look at teacher discourse”. In Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J.M. and Gallardo del Puerto, F. (eds) Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 89-110.
Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Eslami, Z. R and Eslami-Rasekh, A. 2007. “Discourse Markers in Academic Lectures”. Asian EFL Journal. 9 (1), 22-38.
Exley, K. and Dennick, R. 2009. Giving a Lecture: from Presenting to Teaching. London: Routledge Falmer. (1ª ed 2004).
Flowerdew, J. (ed.). 1994. Academic listening: Research perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J. and Tauroza, S. 1995. "The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 435-458.
Halbach, A. and Lázaro, A. 2015. “La acreditación del nivel de lengua inglesa en las universidades españolas: Actualización 2015.” Available online here: http://www.britishcouncil.es/sites/britishcouncil.es/files/british-council-la-acreditacion-del-nivel-de-lengua-inglesa.pdf.
Hyland, K. 2009. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
Jung, E.H. 2003. “The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening Comprehension”. The Modern Language Journal 87(4), 562-577. Lasagabaster, D. and Sierra, J. 2010. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities”. ELT Journal 64(4), 367-375. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccp082
Lynch, T. 1994. “Training lectures for international audiences”. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.). 269-289.
Martín del Pozo, M.A. 2008a. “Impartir asignaturas en inglés: su potencial para el desarrollo de competencias en alumnos y profesores de una ingeniería técnica”.
Jornadas Internacionales Universidad Politécnica de Madrid sobre innovación y convergencia Europea. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Martín del Pozo, M.A. 2008b. “La enseñanza de contenidos en inglés: estudio de caso de una ingeniería técnica en la Universidad de Valladolid”. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Interacción comunicativa y enseñanza de lenguas. Valencia: Universtitat de Valencia, 381-388.
Martín del Pozo, M.A. 2013. “Formación lingüística del profesorado universitario para la docencia en inglés”. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 11 (3), 197-218.
Martín del Pozo, M.A. 2015a. “Teacher education for content and language integrated learning: insights from a current European debate”. Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación de Profesorado 18 (3), 153-168.
Martín del Pozo, M.A. 2015b. “The needs of a new EAP learner: CLIL teachers”. In Shrestha, P. (Ed.) Current Developments in English for Academic and Specific Purposes: Local innovations and global perspectives. Reading: Garnett Education, 115-138.
Marsh, D. and Laitinen, J. 2005. “Medium of instruction in European higher education: Summary of research outcomes of European Network for Language Learning Amongst Undergraduates (ENLU) Task Group 4”. Jyväskylä: UniCOM, University of Jyväskylä.
Mendelssohn, D. 1998. "Teaching Listening", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101.
Miller, L. 2002. “Towards a Model for Lecturing in a Second Language”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1, 145-162.
Núñez Perucha, B. and Dafouz Milne, E. 2007. “Lecturing through the foreign language in a CLIL university context: linguistic and pragmatic implications”. VIEWS Vienna English Working Papers. Current Research in CLIL 2 16 (3) ,U. Smit and Ch. Dalton-Puffer (Eds.), 36-42.
O’Brian, T. (1984) Hearsay. (Review of Lynch 1983). Times Educational Supplement. June 22.
Richards, J. 1983. “Listening Comprehension: Approach, Design, Procedure”, TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 219-240.
Rost, M. 2002. Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman.
Smit, U. and Dafouz, E. 2012. Introduction. In U. Smit, U. and E. Dafouz, E. (Eds.) “Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education: Gaining Insights into English-Medium Instruction at European Universities”. AILA Review, Volume 25.iii, 1–12.
Tehrani, A. and Dastjerdi, H. 2012. “The Pedagogical Impact of Discourse Markers in the Lecture Genre: EFL Learners. Writings in Focus”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3 (3), 423-429.
Thompson, S. 2003. “Text structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organization in academic lectures”. Journal of English for academic purposes, 2, 5-20.
Vandergrift, L. 2004. “Learning to listen or listening to learn”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 3-25.
Young, L. 1994. “University lectures macro-structures and micro-features”. In Flowerdew, J. (Ed.), 159-179.