Participación ciudadana en los medios de comunicación de servicio público: lo que realmente significa

Contenido principal del artículo

Marius Dragomir

Resumen

En un sistema de medios convergente donde el público tiene más que nunca el control de qué, cuándo y dónde consumir contenido, los medios de servicio público deben situar la participación ciudadana en el centro de sus estrategias. Eso significa dar a las audiencias un mayor control sobre la financiación de los medios públicos, una mayor participación de la sociedad civil en la gobernanza de estos medios y una participación más significativa de los ciudadanos en su proceso de producción de contenido. Esta investigación resume las tendencias recientes sobre cómo las empresas de medios en general se involucran con sus audiencias en la economía digital y explora oportunidades y modelos de participación ciudadana en los medios públicos del futuro. Este artículo sostiene que, sin ajustarse a las realidades de la economía digital, lo que significaría construir plataformas de distribución de contenido en red centradas en la audiencia, los medios de servicio público tendrán dificultades para atraer nuevos seguidores, especialmente entre las audiencias más jóvenes, y arriesgarse a alienar a sus audiencias ya en declive. En un ecosistema de medios poblado por un número creciente de productores de contenido que compiten ferozmente para captar la atención de la gente, los medios de servicio público pueden obtener una ventaja competitiva solo si involucran a los ciudadanos de maneras innovadoras y significativas. Sin el elemento de participación ciudadana, corren el riesgo de convertirse en un actor marginal o, peor aún, en algo del pasado.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Dragomir, M. . (2021). Participación ciudadana en los medios de comunicación de servicio público: lo que realmente significa. AdComunica, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2021.21.3
Número
Sección
Informe
Biografía del autor/a

Marius Dragomir, Central European University

Marius Dragomir [DragomirM@ceu.edu] is the Director of the Center for Media, Data and Society at Central European University. He has spent the past two decades in the media research field, specializing in media regulation, digital media, public service media and ownership regulation. Today, he is running several research projects, the largest being Media Influence Matrix (Dragomir, 2020), a global comparative project carried out in 50 countries worldwide.

Citas

Albrechtslund, Anne-Mette Bech (2020). Amazon, Kindle, and Goodreads: implications for literary consumption in the digital age. In: Consumption Markets & Culture, vol.23, no.6. London: Routledge, 553-568.

Bonini, Tiziano (2017). The Participatory Turn in public service media. In: Głowacki, Michal and Jaskiernia, Alicja (eds.). Public Service Media Renewal. Adaptation to Digital Network Challenges. New York: Peter Lang.

Burroughs, Benjamin (2018). House of Netflix: Streaming media and digital lore. In: Popular Communication, vol.17, no.1. London: Routledge, 1-17.

Carpentier, Nico (2011). Media and Participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol: Intellect Books.

Dolan, Rebecca; Conduit, Jodie and Fahy, John (2016). Social media engagement: a construct of positively and negatively valenced engagement behaviours. In: Brodie, J. Rodrick; Hollebeek, D. Linda & Conduit, Jodie (eds.). Customer Engagement. Contemporary issues and challenges. London: Routledge.

Dolan, Rebecca; Conduit, Jodie; Frethey-Bentham, Catherine; Fahy, John and Goodman, Steve (2019). Social media engagement behavior. A framework for engaging customers through social media content. In: European Journal of Marketing, vol.53, No.10. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2213-2243.

Dragomir, Marius (2018). Control the money, control the media: How government uses funding to keep media in line. In: Journalism, vol.19, no.8. London: Sage Publishing, 1131-1148.

Dragomir, Marius (2017). Public Media Must Finally Change. In: Media Power Monitor. Accessed online on 1 September 2020 at

https://mpmonitor.org/2017/01/public-media-must-finally-change/

Dragomir, Marius (2020). Media Influence Matrix: Slovakia. Funding Journalism. Budapest: CMDS.

Effing, Robin; Hillegersberg Jos and Huibers, Theo (2011). Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems?. In: Electronic Participation, vol.6847. Berlin: Springer, 25-35.

Fagerjord, Anders and Kueng, Lucy (2019). Mapping the core actors and flows in streaming video services: what Netflix can tell us about these new media networks. In: Journal of Media Business Studies, vol.16, no.3. London: Routledge, 166-181.

Gan, Chunmei (2018). Gratifications for using social media: A comparative analysis of Sina Weibo and WeChat in China. In: Information Development, vol. 34, no. 2. London: Sage Publishing, 139-147.

Hansen, Elizabeth and Goligoski, Emily (2018). New study: How to build revenue by connecting with your audience. In: Columbia Journalism Review. Accessed online on 23 July 2020 at

https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/how-to-decide-between-subscription-membership-donation.php

Haridakis, Paul and Hanson, Gary (2009). Social Interaction and Co-Viewing With YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection. In: Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol.53, no.2. London: Routledge, 317-335.

Hazari, Sunil; Bergiel, J. Blaise and Sethna, Beheruz N. (2017). Hedonic and utilitarian use of user-generated content on online shopping websites. In: Journal of Marketing Communications, vol.23. no.6. London: Routledge, 572-591.

Hitters, Erik (2018). Dutch media policy: towards the end of reflective diversity? In: van Meerkerk, Edwin and van den Hoogen, Quirijn Lennert (eds.). Cultural Policy in the Polder. 25 Years Dutch Cultural Policy Act. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Holdis, Dumitrita (2019). Media Influence Matrix: Romania. Funding Journalism. Budapest: CMDS.

Jakubowicz, Karol (1996). Access to the Media and Democratic Communication: Theory and Practice in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Sajó, Andras (ed.). Rights of Access to the Media. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Khan, M. Laeeq (2017). Social Media Engagement: What motivates User Participation and Consumption on YouTube? In: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 66. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 236-247.

Lee, Dokyun; Hosanagar, Kartik and Nair, Harikesh S. (2018). Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook. In: Management Science, vol. 64, no. 11. Catonsville: Informs, 4967-5460.

Kwon, Sang Jib; Park, Eunil and Kim, Ki Joon (2014). What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. In: The Social Science Journal, vol.51, no.4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 534-544.

Leswing, Kif (2020). HBO Max online service just launched in the U.S.—here’s a first look. CNBC. Accessed online on 5 October 2020 at

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/hbo-max-new-hbo-streaming-video-service-launches.html

López-Cepeda, Ana-María; López-Golán, Monica and Rodríguez-Castro, Marta (2019). Participatory audiences in the European public service media: Content production and copyright. In: Media Education Research Journal, vol. 27, no. 60. Huelva: Grupo Comunicar, 93-101.

LRT (2018). The LRT Council on the threat for the independence of the Lithuanian National Radio and Television. LRT. Accessed online on 1 July 2020 at

https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/202830/the-lrt-council-on-the-threat-for-the-independence-of-the-lithuanian-national-radio-and-television

Macintosh, Ann and Tambouris, Efthimios (eds.). (2009). Electronic Participation. In: LNCS, vol. 5694, Heidelberg: Springer, 12-23.

Malinen, Sanna (2015). Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies. In: Computers in Human Behavior, vol.46. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 228-238.

Martin, Daniel (2020). The great TV licence turn-off: Figures reveal 237,000 fewer families have paid the BBC fee in the last year as viewers switch to Netflix. Daily Mail. Accessed online on 18 September 2020 at

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8736711/Figures-reveal-237-000-fewer-families-payed-BBC-fee-year-viewers-switch-Netflix.html

Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Schulz, Anne; Andı, Simge and Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. In: RISJ. Accessed online on 1 October 2020 at

https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf

Nussipov, Adil (2019). Media Influence Matrix: Kazakhstan. Funding Journalism. Budapest: CMDS.

O’Halloran, Joseph (2020). Over 11,000 TV channels available in Europe in 2019. RapidTVNews. Accessed online on 15 October 2020 at

https://www.rapidtvnews.com/2020041058340/over-11-000-tv-channels-available-in-europe-in-2019.html

Paun, Carmen (2016). Romanian lawmakers cancel public broadcaster fees. Politico. Accessed online on 1 March 2020 at

https://www.politico.eu/article/romanian-lawmakers-cancel-public-broadcaster-fees-klaus-iohannis-dacian-ciolos-european-broadcasting-union/

Rodríguez-Castro, Marta; Juanatey-Boga, Óscar and Campos-Freire, Francisco (2017). Proximity Communication Models: Governance and Funding of German, Belgian and Spanish Public Regional Media. In: Rocha, Álvaro; Correia, Ana Maria; Adeli, Hojjat; Reis, Luís Paulo and Costanzo, Sandra (eds.). Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Volume 3. Heidelberg: Springer.

Russell, Jon (2018). Netflix launches $5M search for up-and-coming filmmakers in Asia. In: TechCrunch. Accessed online on 6 October 2020 at

https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/05/netflix-rival-iflix-launches-5m-search-for-up-and-coming-filmmakers-in-asia/

Saurwein, Florian; Eberwein, Tobias and Karmasin, Matthias (2019). Public Service Media in Europe: Exploring the Relationship between Funding and Audience Performance. In: Javnost - The Public, vol.26, no.3. London: Routledge, 291-308.

Sehl, Annika; Cornia, Alessio and Nielsen, Rasmus Klein (2018). Public Service News and Social Media. In: RISJ. Accessed online on 15 June 2020 at

https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/public-service-news-and-social-media

Shahbaznezhad, Hamidreza; Dolan, Rebecca and Rashidirad, Mona (2021). The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users’ Engagement Behavior. In: Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol.53. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 47-65.

Solsman, Joan E. (2020). Peacock: Everything to know about NBCUniversal’s streaming app. CNET. Accessed online on 4 October 2020 at

https://www.cnet.com/news/peacock-tv-roku-free-streaming-app-roku-premium-xfinity/

Warner, Mervyn (2019). Funding Public Media: An insight into contemporary funding models. In: Public Media Alliance. Accessed online on 4 March 2020 at

https://www.publicmediaalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Funding-Public-Media_.pdf

Waterson, Jim (2019). ‘You can’t stop people watching’: why BBC subscriptions are a long way off. In: The Guardian. Accessed online on 2 March 2020 at

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/oct/17/why-bbc-subscriptions-are-a-long-way-off

Winslow, George (2011). CME to Launch Voyo Online VOD Platform. In: NextTV. Accessed online on 6 October 2020 at https://www.nexttv.com/news/cme-launch-voyo-online-vod-platform-48229