Polis: Scaling Deliberation by Mapping High Dimensional Opinion Spaces

Contenido principal del artículo

Christopher Small
Michael Bjorkegren
Timo Erkkilä
Lynette Shaw
Colin Megill

Resumen

Deliberative and participatory approaches to democracy seek to directly include citizens in decision-making and agenda-setting processes. These methods date back to the very foundations of democracy in Athens, where regular citizens shared the burden of governance and deliberated every major issue. However, thinkers at the time rightly believed that these methods could not function beyond the scale of the city-state, or polis. Representative democracy as an innovation improved on the scalability of collective decision making, but in doing so, sacrificed the extent to which regular citizens could participate in deliberation. Modern technology, including advances in computational power, machine learning algorithms, and data visualization techniques, presents a unique opportunity to scale out deliberative processes. Here we describe Polis, an open source web application capable of collecting and synthesizing feedback from people in a scalable and distributed fashion. Polis has shown itself capable of building shared understanding, disincentivizing counterproductive behavior (trolling), and cultivating points of consensus. It has done this in the context of journalistic and academic research, and directly as part of decision-making bodies at local and national levels, directly affecting legislation. These results demonstrate that deliberative processes can be scaled up beyond the constraints of in-person gatherings and small groups.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Small, C., Bjorkegren, M., Erkkilä, T., Shaw, L. ., & Megill, C. (2021). Polis: Scaling Deliberation by Mapping High Dimensional Opinion Spaces . RECERCA. Revista De Pensament I Anàlisi, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.5516
Sección
Artículos

Citas

American Assembly at Columbia University (2018). The Bowling Green Civic Assembly. 30 June 2018.

Barry, Liz (2016). vTaiwan: Public participation methods on the cyberpunk frontier of democracy. Civicist, 11 August 2016. Retrieved from: https://civichall.org/civicist/vtaiwan-democracy-frontier/.

Bass, Theo (2019). Crowdsourcing for democracy using Wikisurveys. Nesta Blog, 28 January 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/crowdsourcing-democracy-using-wikisurveys/.

Berditchevskaia, Aleks and Baeck, Peter (2020). The Future of Minds and Machines: How artificial intelligence can enhance collective intelligence. Nesta, 10 February 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/future-minds-and-machines/.

Berger, Peter and Pullberg, Stanley (1965). Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness. History and Theory (Wiley), 4(2), 196-211.

Bertelsmann Stiftung (2020). Digital Democracy – What Europe can learn from Taiwan. Web discussion with Audrey Tang. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5uMMKaSbSw.

Blitzer, Jonathan (2014). In Spain, Politics via Reddit. The New Yorker, 7, October 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/spain-politics-via-reddit.

Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carr, Harry, Smith, Josh and O’Brien, Toby (2020). Polis and the Political Process. Demos, 3 August 2020. Retrieved from: https://demos.co.uk/project/polis-and-the-political-process/.

Cartledge, Paul (2016). Democracy: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dray, Stéphane and Josse, Julie (2015). Principal component analysis with missing values: a comparative survey of methods. Plant Ecology, 216(5), 657-667.

Fisher, Ronald A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ^2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87-94.

Hsiao, Yu-Tang, Lin, Shu-Yang, Tang, Audrey, Narayanan, Darshana and Sarahe, Claudina (2018). vTaiwan: An Empirical Study of Open Consultation Process in Taiwan. SocArXiv.

Horton, Chris (2018). The simple but ingenious system Taiwan uses to crowdsource its laws. MIT Technology Review, 21 August 2018.

Inglehart, Ronald (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

King, Martin (2018). Deliberation and Decision Making Online: Evaluating Platform Design. WestminsterResearch. Retrieved from: https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/b445a61f16b8dc5093d5b3f22272a730f17c0b400f4bba67dc00d6844546e466/4372517.

King, Martin (2109). Building Consensus and Compromise on Uber in Taiwan. Public Impact Observatory (Center for Public Impact), 18 September 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/case-study/building-consensus-compromise-uber-taiwan/.

Lakatos, Imre (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, Louisa, Zhang, Siyu and Yang, Vicky Chuqiao (2017). Do two parties represent the US? Clustering analysis of US public ideology survey. SIAM Undergraduate Research Online, 12.

Lloyd, Stuart P. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2), 129-137.

MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (University of California Press), 1, 281-297.

Madrigal, Alexis C. (2014). How Netflix Reverse-Engineered Hollywood. The Atlantic, 2 January 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/how-netflix-reverse-engineered-hollywood/282679/.

Miller, Carl (2019a). The Death of the Gods: The New Global Power Grab. London: Windmill, Penguin Books.

Miller, Carl (2019b). Can Taiwan Reboot Democracy? BBC, 29 October 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50127713.

Miller, Carl (2019c). Taiwan is making democracy work again. It's time we paid attention. Wired, 26 November 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/taiwan-democracy-social-media.

Miller, Carl (2020). How Taiwan’s ‘civic hackers’ helped find a new way to run the country. The Guardian, 27 September 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/27/taiwan-civic-hackers-polis-consensus-social-media-platform.

Mulgan, Geoff (2017). Big Mind: How Collective Intelligence Can Change Our World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

OECD (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.

OECD-OPSI (2018). Pol.is, Official Languages and a Shift Towards ‘People-First’ Policy Development. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Retrieved from: https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/pol-is-official-languages-and-a-shift-towards-people-first-policy-development/.

Pearson, Karl (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2(11), 559-572.

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard (1985). A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357-384.

Rosenberg, Marshall B. (2003). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. Encinitas: PuddleDancer Press.

Rousseeuw, Peter J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65.

Roweis, Sam (1998). EM Algorithms for PCA and SPCA. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 626-632.

Ruiz, Rebecca (2018). Nasty women (and men) to crowdsource 'marching orders' ahead of midterm elections. Mashable, 19 January 2018. Retrieved from: https://mashable.com/2018/01/19/womens-march-march-on-crowdsource-poll-activism/.

Salganik, Matthew and Levy, Karen E. (2015). Wiki Surveys: Open and Quantifiable Social Data Collection. PLOS One, 10(5).

Segaran, Toby (2007). Programming Collective Intelligence. Newton: O’Reilly.

Tang, Audrey (2016). Uber responds to vTaiwan’s coherent blended volition. Medium, May 2016. Retrieved from: https://blog.pol.is/uber-responds-to-vtaiwans-coherent-blended-volition-3e9b75102b9b.

Tang, Audrey (2019). A Strong Democracy Is a Digital Democracy. The New York Times, 15 October 2019.

Turoff, Murray and Linstone, Harold A. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.

Weber, Max (1969). “Objectivity” in social science and social policy. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press, 49-112.

Yang, Vicky Chuqiao, Abrams, Daniel M., Kernell, Georgia and Motter, Adilson E. (2020). Why Are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A “Satisficing” Dynamical Model. SIAM Review, 62(3), 646-657.