Measuring the impact of CLIL on language skills: a CEFR-based approach for higher education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Author/s
Antonio José Jiménez-Muñoz
Universidad de Oviedo, Spain
ABSTRACT
Advocates of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) have extolled the virtues of this approach to fostering both content and language alike. However, the generalised and varied implementation of EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) in universities worldwide has led many lecturers to question these claims. This paper presents a CEFR (Common European Framework)-based model for measuring the impact of EMI at the tertiary level, the aim being to provide further evidence of the progress made in language-learning in modules taught in a foreign language. Using questionnaires based on the revised and refined CEFR descriptors from EAQUALS (Evaluation and Accreditation of Quality in Language Services), students answer an initial self-assessment survey about their background and language skills, which is controlled by a final questionnaire targeting their perceived progress throughout their instruction. Designed from the ground up with the CEFR as a backdrop, this method can be easily tallied with objective assessment to uncover data about students’ linguistic performance in CLIL contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aguilar, M. and Muñoz, C. 2013. “The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, forthcoming. 1 March 2014
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12006/pdf>
Airey, J. 2012. “‘I don’t teach language’. The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden”. In Smit, U. and E. Dafouz (Eds.) Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education. Gaining Insights into English-Medium Instruction at European Universities. Special Issue of AILA Review 25, 64-79.
Alexander, J. R. 2006. “International programmes in the German-speaking world and englishization: a critical analysis”. In Wilkinson, R. and Zegers, V. (Eds.) Realizing Content and Language Integration in Higher Education. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers, 77-95.
Ball, P. and Lindsay, D. 2013. “Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education: learning from a specific context”. In Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster and J.M. Sierra (Eds.) English-medium instruction at universities: global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 44–64.
Barnett, W. S. Yarosz, D. J. Thomas, J. Jung, K. and Blanco, D. (2007). “Two-way and monolingual English immersion in preschool education: an experimental comparison”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 22, 227-293.
Bonnet, A. 2012. “Towards an evidence base for CLIL: how to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research”. International CLIL Research Journal 1 (4), 65-78.
Clegg, J. 2001. “Can English-medium education work? Why we should be honest about its failures and courageous about change”. In Trewby R. and S. Fitchat (Eds.) Language and Development in Southern Africa. Windhoek: Macmillan, 210-226.
Cobb, B., Vega, D., and Kronauge, C. 2009. “Effects of an elementary dual language immersion school program on junior high school achievement” In Hough, D. L. (Ed.) Middle grades research: Exemplary studies linking theory to practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 27-47.
Coleman, J. 2006. “English-medium teaching in European higher education”. Language Teaching 39 (1), 1-14.
Costa, F. and Coleman, J. A. 2010. “Integrating Content and Language in higher education in Italy: ongoing research’. International CLIL Research Journal 1 (3), 19-29.
Coyle, D. 2008. “CLIL - a pedagogical approach from the European perspective”. In Van Deusen-scholl, N. and N. Hornberger (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Language and Education 2nd Edition Vol. 4. New York: Springer, 1200-1214.
Coyle, D. Hood, P. and Marsh, D. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erling, E. and Hilgendorf, S. 2006. “Language policies in the context of German higher education”. Language Policy 5, 267-292.
Fortanet-Gómez, I. 2013. CLIL in Higher Education. Towards a Multilingual Language Policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Hernandez-Nanclares, N. and Jimenez-Munoz, A. 2014. “English as a Medium of Instruction: research project in bilingual economic education”. International Review of Economics Education 15, in print.
Hunter, M. and Parchoma, P. 2012. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: shifting boundaries and terrain mapping”. In Hodgson, V., C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg and P. Sloep (Eds.) Proceedings of the eighth International Conference on Networked Learning, 2-4 April, 2012. Maastricht: Maastricht School of Management, 514-521.
Kirkgöz, Y. 2005. “Motivation and student perception of studying in an English- medium university”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 1 (1), 101-123. Kirkgöz, Y. 2009. “Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey”. Teaching in Higher Education 14 (1), 81-93.
Lasagabaster D. and Sierra, J. M. 2010. “Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities”. ELT Journal 64, 376-395.
Lindholm-Leary, K. J. 2011. “Achievement and language proficiency of Latino students in dual language programmes: native English speakers, fluent English/previous ELLs, and current ELLs”. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 32(6), 531-545.
Llinares, A. and Whittaker, R. 2010. “Writing and speaking in the history class: data from CLIL and first language contexts”. In Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.) Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 125-144.
Llinares, A., and Morton, T. 2012. “Social perspectives on interaction and language learning in CLIL classrooms”. In Alcón-Soler, E. and M.P. Safont-Jorda (Eds.) Discourse and learning across L2 instructional contexts. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 105-131.
Llinares, A., Morton, T. and Whittaker, R. 2012. The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Londo, M. 2012. Optimising EMI in higher education through CLIL: case study at Vienna. Vienna: Lap Lamberg.
Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE, The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, D. 2006. “English as a medium of instruction in the new global linguistic order: Global characteristics, Local Consequences”. In Stewart, S., Olearski, J and D. Thompson (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing. Abu Dhabi: METSMaC, 29-
Marsh, D. Mehisto, P. Wolff, D. and Frigols, M. J. 2012. European framework for CLIL teacher education: a framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
Mellion, M. J. 2006. “The Challenge of Changing Tongues in Business University Education”. In Wilkinson R. and V. Zegers (Eds). Realizing Content and Language Integration in Higher Education. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers, 212-227.
Morrison, J., Merrick, B., Higgs, S., and Le Métais, J. 2005. “Researching the performance of international students in the UK”. Studies in Higher Education 30(3), 327 - 337.
Navés, T. 2011. “The promising benefits of integrating content and language for EFL writing and overall EFL proficiency”. In Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., J. M. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.) Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts. Bern: Peter Lang, 75-103.
Rienties, B. Brouwer, N., and Lygo-Baker, S. 2013. “The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology”. Teaching and Teacher Education 29, 122-131.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2010. “Written production and CLIL: An Empirical Study”. In Dalton Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit (Eds.) Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL classrooms. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 191-212.
Thomas, W. P. and Collier, V. P. 2002. A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California at Santa Cruz.
Vizconde, C. J. 2006. “Attitudes of student teachers towards the use of English as language of instruction for science and mathematics in the Philippines”.